000 03656naaaa2200457uu 4500
001 http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/25259
005 20220714215614.0
020 _agplh9
020 _a9783944773186
024 7 _a10.12946/gplh9
_cdoi
041 0 _aGerman
042 _adc
072 7 _aHBLA
_2bicssc
072 7 _aLAZ
_2bicssc
100 1 _aPfeifer, Guido
_4edt
_91548627
700 1 _aGrotkamp, Nadine
_4edt
_91548626
700 1 _aPfeifer, Guido
_4oth
_91548627
700 1 _aGrotkamp, Nadine
_4oth
_91548626
245 1 0 _aAußergerichtliche Konfliktlösung in der Antike : Beispiele aus drei Jahrtausenden
260 _aFrankfurt am Main
_bMax Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory
_c2017
300 _a1 electronic resource (182 p.)
506 0 _aOpen Access
_2star
_fUnrestricted online access
520 _a"Antiquity is often utilized as a reference to provide a historical dimension for contemporary phenomena. This also holds true for the prevailing scientific discourse on alternative or adequate remedies of dispute resolution. In this context, historical perspectives seem to be in vogue as narratives to legitimize one or another role model, whereas studies on practical examples from ancient legal orders tend not to be given serious consideration in the current debate. Just as in the case of contemporary legal research, ancient legal history also distinguishes litigation at court from other mechanisms of conflict resolution. Nevertheless, where do the boundaries of judicial and extra-judicial mechanisms of dispute resolution lie within the framework of ancient societies? Are they alternatives in a narrower sense? Is there evidence for concerning the reason there was no (or at least no exclusive) judicial decision? This volume offers a selection of studies of pertinent illustrative material pertaining to these questions. While the relevant sources stemming from the prehistorical period, the Ancient Near East, Hellenistic Egypt and Classical Roman law may vary greatly, this just serves to widen our perspective on ancient times. Heidi Peter-Röcher focuses on strategies of conflict resolution in prehistoric times corresponding to different forms of violence. Hans Neumann, Susanne Paulus, Lena Fijałkowska and Alessandro Hirata delve into case studies situated in the Ancient Near East from Sumerian to Neo-Babylonian times. Three other contributions examine Graeco-Roman Antiquity: Marc Depauw considers non-Greek, i.e., demotic, material from a Hellenistic kingdom, Anna Seelentag embraces the phenomenon of public clamour in the Roman Republic, and Christine Lehne-Gstreinthaler provides a fresh look at the classical arbitration from the perspective of ancient legal history."
540 _aCreative Commons
_fhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/de/
_2cc
_4https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/de/
546 _aGerman
546 _aEnglish
650 7 _aAncient history: to c 500 CE
_2bicssc
_980130
650 7 _aLegal history
_2bicssc
_969726
653 _aRoman Law
653 _aPapyrology
653 _aArbitration
653 _aLegal History
653 _aPrehistory
653 _aAncient Near East
653 _aSettlement (Law)
653 _aAntiquity
653 _aLitigation (Law)
653 _aAlternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
856 4 0 _awww.oapen.org
_uhttps://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/893a8088-2f18-4e6a-bfd9-7205af7dd5d7/GPLH_9.pdf
_70
_zOAPEN Library: download the publication
856 4 0 _awww.oapen.org
_uhttp://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/25259
_70
_zOAPEN Library: description of the publication
999 _c3041212
_d3041212