000			07713cam a2200793 i 4500
001			on1052796879
003			OCoLC
005			20220712075931.0
006			m o d
007			cr cnu|||unuuu
008			180919s2018 enk ob 001 0 eng d
040			_aN$T _beng _erda _epn _cN$T _dN$T _dEBLCP _dOCLCF _dMALCO _dYDX _dMERUC _dUKMGB _dOTZ _dCAUOI _dORU _dUKAHL _dOCL _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dK6U _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO
015			_aGBB887817 _2bnb
016	7		_a018865314 _2Uk
019			_a1053626071 _a1053861155 _a1054377243
020			_a9781787437531 _q(electronic bk.)
020			_a1787437531 _q(electronic bk.)
020			_a9781787439696 _q(Epub)
020			_a1787439690 _q(Epub)
020			_z9781787542402 _q(Print)
020			_z1787542408 _q(Print)
029	1		_aAU@ _b000068480056
029	1		_aUKMGB _b018865314
035			_a(OCoLC)1052796879 _z(OCoLC)1053626071 _z(OCoLC)1053861155 _z(OCoLC)1054377243
050		4	_aK3702
072		7	_aLAW _x001000 _2bisacsh
072		7	_aLNTX _2bicssc
080			_a344
082	0	4	_a344.099 _223
049			_aMAIN
100	1		_aLenskyj, Helen, _eauthor. _91208278
245	1	0	_aGender, athletes' rights, and the Court of Arbitration for Sport / _cby Helen Jefferson Lenskyj.
250			_aFirst edition.
264		1	_aBingley, UK : _bEmerald Publishing Limited, _c2018.
300			_a1 online resource (xi, 222 pages)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
490	1		_aEmerald studies in sport and gender
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
588			_aOnline resource; title from PDF title page (EBSCO, viewed September 20, 2018).
505	0		_aIntroduction. I.1. The Court of Arbitration for Sport -- I.2. Sports Law: Global Impacts -- I.3. Methodology -- Part I. Chapter 1. Sports Law and the Court of Arbitration for Sport -- 1.1. Sports, Law, Politics -- 1.2. Alternative Dispute Resolution -- 1.2.1. ADR: A Feminist Alternative? -- 1.3. International Disputes: (Forced) Arbitration or Litigation? -- 1.4. IOC and CAS: Governance Issues -- 1.5. CAS Jurisdiction: Why? How? -- 1.6. A New Leaf? 1994 CAS Reforms -- 1.7. Repeat Parties -- SGBs and Sports Lawyers -- 1.8. Conclusion -- Chapter 2. CAS and Sport Exceptionalism. 2.1. Alternative Dispute Resolution and Confidentiality -- 2.2. Contribution to the Development of Law -- 2.3. The Costs Issue -- 2.4. Olympic Charter vs National Courts -- 2.5. CAS's Closed List Problem -- 2.6. Sport Autonomy and Sport Specificity Challenged -- 2.6.1. Impartiality: SFT Appeals -- 2.6.2. Benfica and Matuzalem -- 2.7. Sport Exceptionalism and EU Law; -- 2.8. Conclusion -- Part II. Chapter 3. The War on Doping. 3.1. Nationalism -- 3.2. Global Anti-doping Efforts -- 3.3. Anti-doping Discourse -- 3.4. Legalized Doping? -- 3.5. Low Detection, High Surveillance -- 3.6. Strict Liability and the Criminalization of Doping -- 3.7. WADA Code: More Effective, More Intrusive -- 3.8. Second Chances or Life Bans? -- 3.9. Anti-doping Agencies and Governance Problems -- 3.10. Five Women, Five CAS Doping Decisions -- 3.11. Unresolved: Claudia Pechstein -- 3.12. The Russian Doping Controversy -- 3.12.1. IAAF vs Anna Pyatykh and RUSAF -- 3.12.2. CAS vs Oswald -- 3.13. Conclusion -- Chapter 4. Doping, Genes, and Gender. 4.1. Gender Policing -- 4.2. The T Word: Testosterone -- 4.3. Hyperandrogenism -- 4.3.1. A 'Retrospective Clinical Study' and Its Victims -- 4.3.2. Dutee Chand -- 4.4. Quantifying the Unquantifiable -- 4.5. Transgender Policies -- 4.5.1. Kristen Worley -- 4.6. 'Objective Science'? -- 4.7. T/E Tests and Racialized Men -- 4.8. Testosterone: Media Conspiracy Theories -- 4.9. 'Disrepute' Charges -- 4.9.1. Ross Rebagliati -- 4.10. Disrepute and Criminality: Some Australian Examples -- 4.11. Role Models, 'Race'/Ethnicity, and Gender -- 4.12. Conclusion -- Conclusion, 5.1. Reform or Revolution? -- 5.2. An End to Sport Exceptionalism.
520			_aThis book presents an interdisciplinary approach to examining gender-related sports dispute resolution by the Court of Arbitration. Identifying complexities around gender, gender binaries, and the ways in which intersecting identities complicate resolutions, the author demonstrate how athletes' rights are threatened by a forced arbitration process.
520			_a"Disputes over gender, doping, and eligibility in Olympic sport are widely covered in sport studies and in the mainstream media. Less well known are the functions of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), and the threat it poses to athletes'rights by depriving them of access to their own countries'court systems. CAS loosely follows the model of international arbitration tribunals. As in forced arbitration outside of sport, employees - in this case, high performance athletes - sign contracts agreeing to arbitration rather than litigation as the sole means of dispute resolution. Promoting the concept of sport exceptionalism, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) justifies the power it exercises through CAS by claiming that sport must be autonomous and self-regulating, with disputes settled by specialist arbitrators. Arguments in support of this position point to lex sportiva (global sports law) as a valid legal principle in sport-related disputes, which, it is claimed, cannot be understood or resolved by non-specialists. Self-regulation works effectively to protect the Olympic industry brand by keeping disputes 'in the family'. This critical analysis of CAS's history and functions demonstrates how athletes'rights are threatened by the forced arbitration process at CAS. In particular, CAS decisions involving female and gender-variant athletes, and racialized men and women, reflect numerous injustices. As well as the chronic problem of CAS's lack of independence, other issues examined here include confidentiality, lex sportiva, non-precedential awards, the closed list of specialist arbitrators, and, in doping cases, questions concerning strict liability and burden of proof."--Provided by publisher
590			_aeBooks on EBSCOhost _bEBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide
610	2	0	_aCourt of Arbitration for Sport. _9225415
610	2	7	_aCourt of Arbitration for Sport. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst00772328 _9225415
650		0	_aGender identity in sports. _9822297
650		0	_aWomen athletes. _9601977
650		0	_aAthletes _xLegal status, laws, etc. _9225417
650		6	_aIdentité sexuelle dans les sports. _91208279
650		6	_aSportives. _91036278
650		7	_aLicensing, gaming & club law. _2bicssc _91208280
650		7	_aLAW _xAdministrative Law & Regulatory Practice. _2bisacsh _9108670
650		7	_aGender identity in sports. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst01982812 _9822297
650		7	_aAthletes _xLegal status, laws, etc. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst00820047 _9225417
650		7	_aWomen athletes. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst01177178 _9601977
655		4	_aElectronic books.
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _aLenskyj, Helen. _tGender, athletes' rights, and the Court of Arbitration for Sport. _bFirst edition. _dBingley, UK : Emerald Publishing Limited, 2018 _z1787542408 _z9781787542402 _w(OCoLC)1035400257
830		0	_aEmerald studies in sport and gender. _91208281
856	4	0	_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1805052
938			_aAskews and Holts Library Services _bASKH _nAH34420677
938			_aAskews and Holts Library Services _bASKH _nAH34420675
938			_aProQuest Ebook Central _bEBLB _nEBL5517253
938			_aEBSCOhost _bEBSC _n1805052
938			_aYBP Library Services _bYANK _n15723219
938			_aYBP Library Services _bYANK _n15706644
994			_a92 _bINOPJ
999			_c2831633 _d2831633