000 05713cam a2200649Mi 4500
001 on1012881707
003 OCoLC
005 20220712063620.0
006 m o d
007 cr |n|---|||||
008 171125s2017 ncu o 000 0 eng d
040 _aEBLCP
_beng
_epn
_cEBLCP
_dOCLCQ
_dYDX
_dN$T
_dIDB
_dOCLCO
_dN$T
_dOCLCF
_dEBLCP
_dOCLCQ
_dK6U
_dOCLCO
019 _a1012342950
020 _a9781641130929
_q(electronic bk.)
020 _a164113092X
_q(electronic bk.)
020 _z1641130911
020 _z9781641130912
029 1 _aCHNEW
_b000986641
029 1 _aCHVBK
_b509395589
029 1 _aGBVCP
_b1015962092
035 _a(OCoLC)1012881707
_z(OCoLC)1012342950
050 4 _aLC5800
_b.Q378 2017eb
072 7 _aEDU
_x041000
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a371.35
_223
049 _aMAIN
245 0 0 _aQuarterly Review of Distance Education.
_nVolume 18, no. 2 /
_ceditors Michael Simonson, Charles Schlosser.
260 _aCharlotte, NC :
_bInformation Age Publishing,
_c2017.
300 _a1 online resource (112 pages)
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
490 1 _aQuarterly Review of Distance Education Journal
588 0 _aPrint version record.
505 0 _aFront Cover; Statement of Purpose; Quarterly Review of Distance Education; â#x80;#x9C;Research That Guides Practiceâ#x80;#x9D;; Volume 18, Number 2, 2017; ARTICLES; Quarterly Review of Distance Education Editors and Editorial Board; Editors; Assistant Editor; Editorial Assistant; Department Editors; International; Ray J. Amirault, Illinois State University Yusra Laila Visser, Illinois State University; Michelle Rogers-Estable, SUNY Delhi; Editorial Board; Global Standards for Enhancing Quality in Online Learning; Florence Martin and Drew Polly; University of North Carolina Charlotte.
505 8 _aAnnika Jokiaho and Birgit MayLudwigsburg University of Education; The quality of online courses offered has been a topic of discussion in the recent years, and efforts have been taken to establish standards for developing online courses. In this study, the authors review 12 online learning standard documents and ex ... ; INTRODUCTION; ONLINE LEARNING STANDARDS; Purpose of This Study; 1. What are some of the global standard models that focus on enhancing quality in online learning and how many sections and standards are included in each of these standard models?
505 8 _a2. What are the common elements (i.e., most and least emphasized, similarities and differences) of global standards related to online learning?METHOD; Data Sources; 1. Quality on the Line: Benchmarks for Success in Internet Based Distance Education; 2. Online Learning Consortium Quality Scorecard, 2005; 3. Blackboard Exemplary Course Rubric, 2000; 4. Quality Matters 2014, 5th Edition; 5. CHEA Institute for Research and Study of Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2002; 6. Open eQuality Learning Standards, 2004; 7. NADEOSA (South Africa) 2005 revision of 1996 document.
505 8 _a8. ACODE (Australia) 2014 revision of 2007 document9. Asian Association of Open Universities, no date; 10. ECBCheck 2012; 11. UNIQUe 2011; 12. International Organization for Standardization (ISO); Procedure; Data Analysis; RESULTS; DISCUSSION; Table 1; Standard Details; 7; 24; 4; 25; 8; 75; 4; 17; 8; 45; 7; 7; 13; 184; 8; 64; 10; 54; 13; 46; 10; 71; 7; 38; 8.25; 54.16; Table 2; Codes From Standard Analysis; 164; 115; 102; 77; 47; 45; 40; 33; 27; 650; Selection of the 12 Global Standard Documents; Differences in the Documents; Most-Emphasized Standards; Least-Emphasized Standards.
505 8 _aSimilarities and DifferencesImplications for Future Research and the Improvement of Practice; CONCLUSION; REFERENCES; Designing for Quality; An Analysis of Design and Pedagogical Issues in Online Course Development; Mapopa William Sanga; Southwestern Oklahoma State University; This study investigated the process through which 100 online courses were developed in compliance with a purpose-made rubric designed to bring the courses to a level that would meet requirements of membership in a state authorization reciprocity agre ... ; INTRODUCTION; QUALITY IN ONLINE LEARNING.
500 _aSTATE AUTHORIZATION RECIPROCITY AGREEMENT.
520 _aOf ANOVA on Team Scores for Task Type3; 7.289; 0.135; 0.939; 80; 54.180; 3; 64.363; 2.122; 0.104; 80; 30.328; 217.276; 3; 72.425; 2.126; 0.103; 80; 34.066; Table 6; Lower Bias Compared to Higher Bias Team Personality by Task; RECOMMENDATIONS; LIMITATIONS; REFERENCES; APPENDIX A; Week 1: Team Memo Assignment; APPENDIX B; Week 5; Marketplace Simulation Student Instructions.
590 _aeBooks on EBSCOhost
_bEBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide
650 0 _aDistance education.
_990375
650 6 _aEnseignement à distance.
_9886188
650 7 _aEDUCATION
_xDistance, Open & Online Education.
_2bisacsh
_91179035
650 7 _aDistance education.
_2fast
_0(OCoLC)fst00895456
_990375
655 0 _aElectronic books.
655 4 _aElectronic books.
700 1 _aSchlosser, Charles.
_9853945
776 0 8 _iPrint version:
_aSimonson, Michael.
_tQuarterly Review of Distance Education : Volume 18 #2.
_dCharlotte, NC : Information Age Publishing, ©2017
_z9781641130912
830 0 _aQuarterly Review of Distance Education Journal.
_91179036
856 4 0 _uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1632267
938 _aEBL - Ebook Library
_bEBLB
_nEBL5430292
938 _aEBL - Ebook Library
_bEBLB
_nEBL5149539
938 _aEBSCOhost
_bEBSC
_n1632267
938 _aYBP Library Services
_bYANK
_n14983168
994 _a92
_bINOPJ
999 _c2822600
_d2822600