Judicial reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act / edited by Helen Fenwick, Gavin Phillipson and Roger Masterman.

Includes index.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

A collection of essays examining the judicial decision-making process under the Human Rights Act 1998.

Print version record.

1. Judicial Reasoning and the Human Rights Act 1998 Helen Fenwick, Roger Masterman and Gavin Phillipson -- Part I. The Interpretation of the Human Rights Act 1998: 2. The System of the European Convention on Human Rights and the Human Rights Act: The View from the Outside Colin Warbrick -- 3. Aspiration or Foundation? The Status of Strasbourg Jurisprudence and the 'Convention Rights' in Domestic Law Roger Masterman -- 4. Institutional Roles and Meanings of 'Compatibility' under the Human Rights Act 1998 David Feldman -- 5. Choosing between Sections 3 and 4 Human Rights Act 1998: Judicial Reasoning after Ghaidan v Mendoza Aileen Kavanagh -- 6. Clarity postponed? Horizontal Effect after Campbell and Re. S. Gavin Phillipson -- 7. The Standard of Judicial Review and Legal Reasoning after the Human Rights Act Ian Leigh -- 8. Principles of Deference under the Human Rights Act Sir David Keene -- Part II. The Human Rights Act and Substantive Law: 9. The Common Law, Privacy and the Convention Gavin Phillipson -- 10. Judicial Reasoning in Clashing Rights Cases Helen Fenwick -- 11. Family Law and the Human Rights Act 1998: Judicial Restraint or Revolution? Sonia Harris-Short -- 12. Article 14: A Protector, Not a Prosecutor Aaron Baker -- 13. Criminal Procedure, The Presumption of Innocence and Judicial Reasoning under the Human Rights Act Paul Roberts -- 14. Concluding remarks Ian Leigh.

eBooks on EBSCOhost EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide