Heidegger and logic : the place of lógos in Being and time / Greg Shirley.

Includes bibliographical references (pages 164-169) and index.

Print version record.

Acknowledgements; Introduction; Chapter 1 Logic and Metaphysics; 1.1. Early Logical Writings; 1.1.1 Neo-Kantianism; 1.1.2 Lask and the Habilitationsschrift; 1.2 The Analytic of Dasein; 1.2.1 The Question of Being; 1.2.2 Ontology and Epistemology; 1.2.3 Possibility and Temporality; Chapter 2 Concept and Judgement; 2.1 The Copula; 2.1.1 Assertion, Discourse, and the Copula; 2.1.2 Aristotle, Lotze, and the Negative Copula; 2.1.3 The Copula and Intelligibility; 2.2 Truth; 2.2.1 Ontical and Ontological Truth; 2.2.2 Truth and Normativity; 2.3 Negation; 2.3.1 Negation and Being.

2.3.2 Negation and TruthChapter 3 Inference and Lógos; 3.1 Ground and Logic; 3.1.1 Ground as Inference; 3.1.2 Ground as Consequence; 3.2 Lógos and Logic; 3.2.1 Lógos and Temporality; 3.2.2 Logic as the Metaphysics of Truth; Chapter 4 Heidegger and Contemporary Logic; 4.1 Mathematical Logic; 4.1.1 Systems of Logic; 4.1.2 Hermeneutics and Metatheory; 4.1.3 Disclosedness and Satisfaction; 4.2 Irrationalism; 4.2.1 Heidegger the Irrationalist; 4.2.2 Reassessment and Conclusion; Notes; Bibliography; Index; A; B; C; D; E; F; G; H; I; J; K; L; M; N; O; P; R; S; T; U; W.

There is a tradition of interpreting Heidegger's remarks on logic as an attempt to flout, revise, or eliminate logic, and of thus characterizing Heidegger as an irrationalist. Heidegger and Logic looks closely at Heidegger's writings on logic in the Being and Time era and argues that Heidegger does not seek to discredit logic, but to determine its scope and explain its foundations. Through a close examination of the relevant texts, Greg Shirley shows that this tradition of interpretation rests on mischaracterizations and false assumptions. What emerges from Heidegger's remarks on logic is an a.

English.

eBooks on EBSCOhost EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide