Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Managing university intellectual property in the public interest / Committee on Management of University Intellectual Property: Lessons from a Generation of Experience, Research, and Dialogue ; Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy ; Committee on Science, Technology, and Law ; Policy and Global Affairs ; Stephen A. Merrill and Anne-Marie Mazza, editors ; National Research Council of the National Academies.

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextPublication details: Washington, D.C. : National Research Council, National Academies Press, ©2011.Description: 1 online resource (xv, 102 pages)Content type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9780309161121
  • 0309161126
  • 1283019124
  • 9781283019125
Subject(s): Genre/Form: Additional physical formats: Print version:: Managing university intellectual property in the public interest.DDC classification:
  • 346.73048 22
LOC classification:
  • KF2979 .N386 2011eb
Online resources:
Contents:
The growth of university technology transfer -- Influence of technology transfer on university research norms and practices -- Effectiveness and accountability of university technology transfer activities -- Findings and recommendations -- Appendixes. -- A. Conference agenda -- B. Conference presenters -- C. Biographical information of committee and staff.
Summary: Thirty years ago federal policy underwent a major change through the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, which fostered greater uniformity in the way research agencies treat inventions arising from the work they sponsor. Before the Act, if government agencies funded university research, the funding agency retained ownership of the knowledge and technologies that resulted. However, very little federally funded research was actually commercialized. As a result of the Act's passage, patenting and licensing activity from such research has accelerated. Although the system created by the Act has remained stable, it has generated debate about whether it might impede other forms of knowledge transfer. Concerns have also arisen that universities might prioritize commercialization at the expense of their traditional mission to pursue fundamental knowledge--for example, by steering research away from curiosity-driven topics toward applications that could yield financial returns. To address these concerns, the National Research Council convened a committee of experts from universities, industry, foundations, and similar organizations, as well as scholars of the subject, to review experience and evidence of the technology transfer system's effects and to recommend improvements. The present volume summarizes the committee's principal findings and recommendations.
Item type:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Home library Collection Call number Materials specified Status Date due Barcode
Electronic-Books Electronic-Books OPJGU Sonepat- Campus E-Books EBSCO Available

Includes bibliographical references.

The growth of university technology transfer -- Influence of technology transfer on university research norms and practices -- Effectiveness and accountability of university technology transfer activities -- Findings and recommendations -- Appendixes. -- A. Conference agenda -- B. Conference presenters -- C. Biographical information of committee and staff.

Thirty years ago federal policy underwent a major change through the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, which fostered greater uniformity in the way research agencies treat inventions arising from the work they sponsor. Before the Act, if government agencies funded university research, the funding agency retained ownership of the knowledge and technologies that resulted. However, very little federally funded research was actually commercialized. As a result of the Act's passage, patenting and licensing activity from such research has accelerated. Although the system created by the Act has remained stable, it has generated debate about whether it might impede other forms of knowledge transfer. Concerns have also arisen that universities might prioritize commercialization at the expense of their traditional mission to pursue fundamental knowledge--for example, by steering research away from curiosity-driven topics toward applications that could yield financial returns. To address these concerns, the National Research Council convened a committee of experts from universities, industry, foundations, and similar organizations, as well as scholars of the subject, to review experience and evidence of the technology transfer system's effects and to recommend improvements. The present volume summarizes the committee's principal findings and recommendations.

Print version record.

eBooks on EBSCOhost EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonepat-Narela Road, Sonepat, Haryana (India) - 131001

Send your feedback to glus@jgu.edu.in

Hosted, Implemented & Customized by: BestBookBuddies   |   Maintained by: Global Library