The new PhD : how to build a better graduate education / Leonard Cassuto and Robert Weisbuch.

By:

Cassuto, Leonard, 1960- [author.]

Contributor(s):

Weisbuch, Robert, 1946- [author.]

Material type: Text

text

Media type:

computer

Carrier type:

online resource

ISBN:

9781421439778
1421439778

Subject(s):

Genre/Form:

Electronic books.

Additional physical formats: Print version:: New PhD.DDC classification:

378.2/42 23

LOC classification:

LB2386 .C376 2021

Online resources:

Click here to access online

Contents:

Then and now: two recent eras of reform -- Purpose, then path: a practical guide to starting the conversation -- Career diversity: a liberal arts approach to the PhD -- Admissions and attrition -- Student support and time to degree -- Curing the curriculum and examining the exam -- advising -- Students as teachers -- Degrees: what should they look like? What should they do? -- Public scholarship: what it is, where it came from, and what it requires -- Conclusion. from words to actions -- Postscript. Graduate school after COVID-19.

Summary: "This book is a guide to fixing dysfunctional PhD education. It is written for faculty, administrators, students, and the interested general public. The coauthors discovered a surprising degree of consensus on what's wrong with doctoral programs, from admissions judgments to career outcomes. Out of their study of what went wrong, the coauthors propose a method and a model for student-centered change in doctoral education"-- Provided by publisher.

Item type:

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings
Item type	Home library	Collection	Call number	Materials specified	Status	Date due	Barcode
Electronic-Books	OPJGU Sonepat- Campus	E-Books EBSCO			Available

"This book is a guide to fixing dysfunctional PhD education. It is written for faculty, administrators, students, and the interested general public. The coauthors discovered a surprising degree of consensus on what's wrong with doctoral programs, from admissions judgments to career outcomes. Out of their study of what went wrong, the coauthors propose a method and a model for student-centered change in doctoral education"-- Provided by publisher.