Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

The moral complexities of eating meat / edited by Ben Bramble and Bob Fischer.

Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextPublisher: New York, NY : Oxford University Press, 2016Description: 1 online resourceContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9780199353910
  • 0199353913
Subject(s): Genre/Form: Additional physical formats: Print version:: Moral complexities of eating meat.DDC classification:
  • 338.1/76 23
LOC classification:
  • TX373 .M67 2016eb
Online resources:
Contents:
Part I: Defending Meat -- 1. Christopher Belshaw: "Meat" -- 2. Donald Bruckner: "Strict Vegetarianism is Immoral" -- 3. J. Baird Callicott: "The Environmental Omnivore's Dilemma" -- Part II: Challenging Meat -- 4. Julia Driver: "Individual Consumption and Moral Complicity" -- 5. Mark Budolfson: "Is it Wrong to Eat Meat from Factory Farms? If So, Why?" -- 6. Clayton Littlejohn: "Potency and Permissibility" -- 7. Tristram McPherson: "A Moorean Defense of the Omnivore" -- 8. Ben Bramble: "The Case Against Meat" -- Part III: Future Directions -- 9. Lori Gruen and Robert Jones: "Veganism as an Aspiration" -- 10. Neil Levy: "Vegetarianism: Towards Ideological Impurity" -- 11. Bob Fischer: "Against Blaming the Blameworthy" -- 12. Alexandra Plakias: "Beetles, Bicycles, and Breath Mints: How 'Omni' Should Omnivores Be?"
Summary: In a world of industrialized farming and feed lots, is eating meat ever a morally responsible choice? Is eating organic or free range sufficient to change the moral equation? Is there a moral cost in not eating meat? As billions of animals continue to be raised and killed by human beings for human consumption, affecting the significance and urgency in answering these questions grow. This volume collects twelve new essays by leading moral philosophers who address the difficult questions surrounding meat eating by examining various implications and consequences of our food choices. Some argue for the moral permissibility of eating meat by suggesting views such as farm animals would not exist and flourish otherwise, and the painless death that awaits is no loss to them. Others consider more specific examples like whether buying French fries at McDonalds is just as problematic as ordering a Big Mac due to the action's indirect support of a major purveyor of meat. The Moral Complexities of Eating Meat is a stimulating contribution to the ongoing debate on meat consumption and actively challenges readers to reevaluate their stand on food and animal ethics.--INSIDE FLAP.
Item type:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Home library Collection Call number Materials specified Status Date due Barcode
Electronic-Books Electronic-Books OPJGU Sonepat- Campus E-Books EBSCO Available

Vendor-supplied metadata.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Part I: Defending Meat -- 1. Christopher Belshaw: "Meat" -- 2. Donald Bruckner: "Strict Vegetarianism is Immoral" -- 3. J. Baird Callicott: "The Environmental Omnivore's Dilemma" -- Part II: Challenging Meat -- 4. Julia Driver: "Individual Consumption and Moral Complicity" -- 5. Mark Budolfson: "Is it Wrong to Eat Meat from Factory Farms? If So, Why?" -- 6. Clayton Littlejohn: "Potency and Permissibility" -- 7. Tristram McPherson: "A Moorean Defense of the Omnivore" -- 8. Ben Bramble: "The Case Against Meat" -- Part III: Future Directions -- 9. Lori Gruen and Robert Jones: "Veganism as an Aspiration" -- 10. Neil Levy: "Vegetarianism: Towards Ideological Impurity" -- 11. Bob Fischer: "Against Blaming the Blameworthy" -- 12. Alexandra Plakias: "Beetles, Bicycles, and Breath Mints: How 'Omni' Should Omnivores Be?"

In a world of industrialized farming and feed lots, is eating meat ever a morally responsible choice? Is eating organic or free range sufficient to change the moral equation? Is there a moral cost in not eating meat? As billions of animals continue to be raised and killed by human beings for human consumption, affecting the significance and urgency in answering these questions grow. This volume collects twelve new essays by leading moral philosophers who address the difficult questions surrounding meat eating by examining various implications and consequences of our food choices. Some argue for the moral permissibility of eating meat by suggesting views such as farm animals would not exist and flourish otherwise, and the painless death that awaits is no loss to them. Others consider more specific examples like whether buying French fries at McDonalds is just as problematic as ordering a Big Mac due to the action's indirect support of a major purveyor of meat. The Moral Complexities of Eating Meat is a stimulating contribution to the ongoing debate on meat consumption and actively challenges readers to reevaluate their stand on food and animal ethics.--INSIDE FLAP.

eBooks on EBSCOhost EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonepat-Narela Road, Sonepat, Haryana (India) - 131001

Send your feedback to glus@jgu.edu.in

Hosted, Implemented & Customized by: BestBookBuddies   |   Maintained by: Global Library