Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2012 : Selected papers from 'Going Romance' Leuven 2012 / edited by Karen Lahousse, Stefania Marzo, KU Leuven.

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextSeries: Romance languages and linguistic theory ; volume 6.Publisher: Amsterdam ; Philadelphia : John Benjamins Publishing Company, [2015]Description: 1 online resourceContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9789027269263
  • 9027269262
Subject(s): Genre/Form: Additional physical formats: Print version:: Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2012DDC classification:
  • 440 23
LOC classification:
  • PC11 .G65 2012eb
Online resources:
Contents:
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2012; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of content; Issues in Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory; References; Clausal domains and clitic placement generalizations in Romance; 1. Introduction; 1.1 Background: Object clitics and functional heads; 1.2 Variation in object clitic placement; 1.3 Possible approaches to the question; 2. Low OCL placement dialects (the "Borgomanerese-type" language) ; 2.1 OCL placement in simple tense clauses in Northeast Piedmont.
2.1.1 An up-close look at one of these varieties: Borgomanerese simple tense clauses2.2 OCL placement in compound tense clauses in Borgomanerese-type varieties and in Piedmontese; 3. A first attempt at an approach to the question of variation in OCL placement (the Missing-Head Hypothesis); 3.1 Problems with the Missing-Head Hypothesis; 3.1.1 Cross-linguistic entailment; 3.1.2 Cross-linguistic entailment unidirectional; 3.1.3 Predictions of Missing-Head Hypothesis; 4. The feature content hypothesis: All languages have the same potential OCL adjunction sites.
4.1 Back to the cross-linguistic generalization4.2 Eligibility of a particular functional head for OCL adjunction: The feature content hypothesis; 4.2.1 Simple tense clauses; 4.2.2 Compound tense clauses and the uni-directional entailment; 4.2.2.1 Borgomanerese compound tense clauses. As discussed earlier, following Kayne (1993), Rizzi (2000), and Tortora (2010), I take compound tense clauses to be "lightly" bi-clausal, whereby the participial clause has a bit of functional architecture pro.
4.2.2.4 Absolute Small Clauses (ASCs). Although Italian does not allow enclisis on past participles in the compound tenses, it is well known that it requires enclisis on participles in Absolute Small Clauses (Belletti 1990):4.2.2.5 Romance Imperatives. It is also well known that all Romance ℗Ưbehaves like Borgomanerese-type languages when it comes to Imperatives. That is, ℗ƯRomance Imperatives robustly exhibit OCL enclisis:; 5. Another prediction made by Feature Spreading/Feature Content Hypotheses for causatives; 5.1 Obligatory clitic climbing in Romance Causatives.
Summary: This investigation constitutes a quantitative variationist approach toward Spanish in contact with Catalan in Barcelona, Spain. It seeks to empirically measure concrete usage patterns of two phonetic variants, [9±] and [z], in the Spanish of Catalan-Spanish bilinguals, as well as establish the extent to which both variants are conditioned by linguistic factors and Catalan dominance. The careful Spanish speech of 20 Barcelonan females (ages 18-27) was elicited through a word-reading task. Goldvarb binomial logistic regression analyses revealed that sensitivity to linguistic factors varied accord.
Item type:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Home library Collection Call number Materials specified Status Date due Barcode
Electronic-Books Electronic-Books OPJGU Sonepat- Campus E-Books EBSCO Available

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Print version record.

Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2012; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of content; Issues in Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory; References; Clausal domains and clitic placement generalizations in Romance; 1. Introduction; 1.1 Background: Object clitics and functional heads; 1.2 Variation in object clitic placement; 1.3 Possible approaches to the question; 2. Low OCL placement dialects (the "Borgomanerese-type" language) ; 2.1 OCL placement in simple tense clauses in Northeast Piedmont.

2.1.1 An up-close look at one of these varieties: Borgomanerese simple tense clauses2.2 OCL placement in compound tense clauses in Borgomanerese-type varieties and in Piedmontese; 3. A first attempt at an approach to the question of variation in OCL placement (the Missing-Head Hypothesis); 3.1 Problems with the Missing-Head Hypothesis; 3.1.1 Cross-linguistic entailment; 3.1.2 Cross-linguistic entailment unidirectional; 3.1.3 Predictions of Missing-Head Hypothesis; 4. The feature content hypothesis: All languages have the same potential OCL adjunction sites.

4.1 Back to the cross-linguistic generalization4.2 Eligibility of a particular functional head for OCL adjunction: The feature content hypothesis; 4.2.1 Simple tense clauses; 4.2.2 Compound tense clauses and the uni-directional entailment; 4.2.2.1 Borgomanerese compound tense clauses. As discussed earlier, following Kayne (1993), Rizzi (2000), and Tortora (2010), I take compound tense clauses to be "lightly" bi-clausal, whereby the participial clause has a bit of functional architecture pro.

4.2.2.4 Absolute Small Clauses (ASCs). Although Italian does not allow enclisis on past participles in the compound tenses, it is well known that it requires enclisis on participles in Absolute Small Clauses (Belletti 1990):4.2.2.5 Romance Imperatives. It is also well known that all Romance ℗Ưbehaves like Borgomanerese-type languages when it comes to Imperatives. That is, ℗ƯRomance Imperatives robustly exhibit OCL enclisis:; 5. Another prediction made by Feature Spreading/Feature Content Hypotheses for causatives; 5.1 Obligatory clitic climbing in Romance Causatives.

This investigation constitutes a quantitative variationist approach toward Spanish in contact with Catalan in Barcelona, Spain. It seeks to empirically measure concrete usage patterns of two phonetic variants, [9±] and [z], in the Spanish of Catalan-Spanish bilinguals, as well as establish the extent to which both variants are conditioned by linguistic factors and Catalan dominance. The careful Spanish speech of 20 Barcelonan females (ages 18-27) was elicited through a word-reading task. Goldvarb binomial logistic regression analyses revealed that sensitivity to linguistic factors varied accord.

eBooks on EBSCOhost EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonepat-Narela Road, Sonepat, Haryana (India) - 131001

Send your feedback to glus@jgu.edu.in

Hosted, Implemented & Customized by: BestBookBuddies   |   Maintained by: Global Library