Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Costs and contributions to support the U.S. military presence overseas : inquiry and analyses / Loretta Hudson, editor.

Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextSeries: Military and veteran issuesPublisher: New York : Nova Science Publishers, [2014]Description: 1 online resource (viii, 134 pages)Content type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9781634631518
  • 163463151X
Subject(s): Genre/Form: Additional physical formats: Print version:: Costs and contributions to support the U.S. military presence overseasDDC classification:
  • 355.7068/1 23
LOC classification:
  • UA26.A2
Online resources:
Contents:
COSTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS TO SUPPORT THE U.S. MILITARY PRESENCE OVERSEAS: INQUIRY AND ANALYSES; COSTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS TO SUPPORT THE U.S. MILITARY PRESENCE OVERSEAS: INQUIRY AND ANALYSES; Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data; CONTENTS; PREFACE; Chapter 1: INQUIRY INTO U.S. COSTS AND ALLIED CONTRIBUTIONS TO SUPPORT THE U.S. MILITARY PRESENCE OVERSEAS; EXECUTIVE SUMMARY; CONCLUSIONS OF THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE; INTRODUCTION; I. RESIDUAL VALUE COMPENSATION IN GERMANY; II. COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE U.S. MILITARY PRESENCE IN THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH KOREA.
III. COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE U.S. MILITARY PRESENCE IN JAPANCOMMITTEE ACTION; Chapter 2: DEFENSE MANAGEMENT: COMPREHENSIVE COST INFORMATION AND ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES NEEDED TO ASSESS MILITARY POSTURE IN ASIA; WHY GAO DID THIS STUDY; WHAT GAO RECOMMENDS; WHAT GAO FOUND; ABBREVIATIONS; BACKGROUND; DOD HAS NOT FULLY ESTIMATED THE COST OF POSTURE INITIATIVES IN SOUTH KOREA OR PROVIDED AN ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES TO TOUR NORMALIZATION; DOD HAS NOT ESTIMATED THE COST OF POSTURE INITIATIVES IN JAPAN AND GUAM; DOD LACKS COMPREHENSIVE COST INFORMATION NEEDED FOR AFFORDABILITY ANALYSIS; CONCLUSION.
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTIONAGENCY COMMENTS AND OUR EVALUATION; APPENDIX I: SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY; APPENDIX II: COMMITTEE REPORTING DIRECTION CONTAINED IN SENATE REPORT 111-226 (S. REP. NO. 111-226, AT 13-15 (2010)); APPENDIX III. ADDITIONAL PACOM COST AND FUNDING DATA; Chapter 3: DEFENSE MANAGEMENT: ADDITIONAL COST INFORMATION AND STAKEHOLDER INPUT NEEDED TO ASSESS MILITARY POSTURE IN EUROPE; WHY GAO DID THIS STUDY; WHAT GAO RECOMMENDS; WHAT GAO FOUND; BACKGROUND; DOD GUIDANCE DOES NOT REQUIRE EUCOM TO ESTIMATE OR REPORT THE TOTAL COST OF POSTURE.
Eucom lacks a systematic process to evaluate posture alternatives and routinely incorporate interagency views in posture planningconclusion; recommendations for executive action; agency comments and our evaluation; appendix i. scope and methodology; appendix ii. total cost of dod's installations in eucom's area of responsibility; index.
Summary: The United States spends more than 10 billion a year to support our permanent military presence overseas. That does not include military personnel costs or spending to support the war in Afghanistan. Nearly 70 percent of that 10 billion is spent in Germany, the Republic of Korea, and Japan. The fact that such a high percentage of our overseas spending involves those three countries is not surprising. Germany is among our most important partners in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), an alliance President Obama has rightly called ""indispensable to global security and prosperity."" T.
Item type:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Home library Collection Call number Materials specified Status Date due Barcode
Electronic-Books Electronic-Books OPJGU Sonepat- Campus E-Books EBSCO Available

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page viewed on June 4, 2020.

COSTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS TO SUPPORT THE U.S. MILITARY PRESENCE OVERSEAS: INQUIRY AND ANALYSES; COSTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS TO SUPPORT THE U.S. MILITARY PRESENCE OVERSEAS: INQUIRY AND ANALYSES; Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data; CONTENTS; PREFACE; Chapter 1: INQUIRY INTO U.S. COSTS AND ALLIED CONTRIBUTIONS TO SUPPORT THE U.S. MILITARY PRESENCE OVERSEAS; EXECUTIVE SUMMARY; CONCLUSIONS OF THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE; INTRODUCTION; I. RESIDUAL VALUE COMPENSATION IN GERMANY; II. COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE U.S. MILITARY PRESENCE IN THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH KOREA.

III. COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE U.S. MILITARY PRESENCE IN JAPANCOMMITTEE ACTION; Chapter 2: DEFENSE MANAGEMENT: COMPREHENSIVE COST INFORMATION AND ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES NEEDED TO ASSESS MILITARY POSTURE IN ASIA; WHY GAO DID THIS STUDY; WHAT GAO RECOMMENDS; WHAT GAO FOUND; ABBREVIATIONS; BACKGROUND; DOD HAS NOT FULLY ESTIMATED THE COST OF POSTURE INITIATIVES IN SOUTH KOREA OR PROVIDED AN ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES TO TOUR NORMALIZATION; DOD HAS NOT ESTIMATED THE COST OF POSTURE INITIATIVES IN JAPAN AND GUAM; DOD LACKS COMPREHENSIVE COST INFORMATION NEEDED FOR AFFORDABILITY ANALYSIS; CONCLUSION.

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EXECUTIVE ACTIONAGENCY COMMENTS AND OUR EVALUATION; APPENDIX I: SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY; APPENDIX II: COMMITTEE REPORTING DIRECTION CONTAINED IN SENATE REPORT 111-226 (S. REP. NO. 111-226, AT 13-15 (2010)); APPENDIX III. ADDITIONAL PACOM COST AND FUNDING DATA; Chapter 3: DEFENSE MANAGEMENT: ADDITIONAL COST INFORMATION AND STAKEHOLDER INPUT NEEDED TO ASSESS MILITARY POSTURE IN EUROPE; WHY GAO DID THIS STUDY; WHAT GAO RECOMMENDS; WHAT GAO FOUND; BACKGROUND; DOD GUIDANCE DOES NOT REQUIRE EUCOM TO ESTIMATE OR REPORT THE TOTAL COST OF POSTURE.

Eucom lacks a systematic process to evaluate posture alternatives and routinely incorporate interagency views in posture planningconclusion; recommendations for executive action; agency comments and our evaluation; appendix i. scope and methodology; appendix ii. total cost of dod's installations in eucom's area of responsibility; index.

The United States spends more than 10 billion a year to support our permanent military presence overseas. That does not include military personnel costs or spending to support the war in Afghanistan. Nearly 70 percent of that 10 billion is spent in Germany, the Republic of Korea, and Japan. The fact that such a high percentage of our overseas spending involves those three countries is not surprising. Germany is among our most important partners in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), an alliance President Obama has rightly called ""indispensable to global security and prosperity."" T.

eBooks on EBSCOhost EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonepat-Narela Road, Sonepat, Haryana (India) - 131001

Send your feedback to glus@jgu.edu.in

Hosted, Implemented & Customized by: BestBookBuddies   |   Maintained by: Global Library