TY  - BOOK
AU  - Alexander,Larry
AU  - Ferzan,Kimberly Kessler
AU  - Morse,Stephen J.
TI  - Crime and culpability: a theory of criminal law 
T2  - Cambridge introductions to philosophy and law
SN  - 9781139129909
AV  - K5103 .A44 2009eb
U1  - 345/.001 22
PY  - 2009///
CY  - Cambridge [U.K.], New York
PB  - Cambridge University Press
KW  - Punishment
KW  - Philosophy
KW  - Criminal law
KW  - United States
KW  - LAW
KW  - Criminal Law
KW  - General
KW  - bisacsh
KW  - fast
KW  - Rechtsphilosophie
KW  - gnd
KW  - Verbrechen
KW  - Strafjustiz
KW  - Strafrecht
KW  - Droit pénal
KW  - Philosophie
KW  - États-Unis
KW  - ram
KW  - Proportionnalité des délits et des peines
KW  - USA
KW  - swd
KW  - Electronic books
KW  - gtlm
N1  - Includes bibliographical references (pages 331-348) and index; Part One. Introduction : retributivism and the criminal law. Criminal law, punishment, and desert -- Part Two. The culpable choice. The essence of culpability : acts manifesting insufficient concern for the legally protected interests of others ; Negligence ; Defeaters of culpability -- Part Three. The culpable act. Only culpability, not resulting harm, affects desert ; When are inchoate crimes culpable and why? ; The locus of culpability -- Part Four. A proposed code. What a culpability-based criminal code might look like
N2  - "This book presents a comprehensive overview of what the criminal law would look like if organised around the principle that those who deserve punishment should receive punishment commensurate with, but no greater than, that which they deserve. Larry Alexander and Kimberly Kessler Ferzan argue that desert is a function of the actor's culpability, and that culpability is a function of the risks of harm to protected interests that the actor believes he is imposing and his reasons for acting in the face of those risks. The authors deny that resultant harms, as well as unperceived risks, affect the actor's desert. They thus reject punishment for inadvertent negligence as well as for intentions or preparatory acts that are not risky. Alexander and Ferzan discuss the reasons for imposing risks that negate or mitigate culpability, the individuation of crimes, and omissions."--Provided by publisher
UR  - https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=400750
ER  -