TY  - BOOK
AU  - Walker,Stephen G.
AU  - Malici,Akan
TI  - U.S. presidents and foreign policy mistakes
SN  - 9780804780698
AV  - JZ1480 
U1  - 327.73327.73 
PY  - 2011///
CY  - Stanford, Calif.
PB  - Stanford University Press
KW  - National security
KW  - United States
KW  - Decision making
KW  - Presidents
KW  - Political science
KW  - Présidents
KW  - États-Unis
KW  - Prise de décision
KW  - POLITICAL SCIENCE
KW  - Government
KW  - International
KW  - bisacsh
KW  - International Relations
KW  - General
KW  - fast
KW  - Foreign relations
KW  - Relations extérieures
KW  - Electronic books
N1  - Mistakes as a feature of everyday political life -- Foreign policy mistakes and the exercise of power -- Fearing losses too little : deterrence failures -- Fearing losses too much : false alarm failures -- Seeking gains too late : reassurance failures -- Seeking gains too soon : false hope failures -- Foreign policy analysis : maximizing rationality -- Foreign policy analysis : minimizing mistakes -- Avoiding foreign policy mistakes : extension and expansion -- Foreign policy dynamics : the Middle East and South Asia systems -- Some final thoughts : exploring the rationality frontier
N2  - "Mistakes, in the form of bad decisions, are a common feature of every presidential administration, and their consequences run the gamut from unnecessary military spending, to missed opportunities for foreign policy advantage, to needless bloodshed. This book analyzes a range of presidential decisions made in the realm of US foreign policy - with a special focus on national security - over the past half century in order to create a roadmap of the decision process and a guide to better foreign policy decision-making in the increasingly complex context of 21st century international relations. Mistakes are analyzed in two general categories - ones of omission and ones of commission within the context of perceived threats and opportunities. Within this framework, the authors discuss how past scholarship has addressed these questions and argue that this research has not explicitly identified a vantage point around which the answers to these questions revolve. They propose game theory models of complex adaptive systems for minimizing bad decisions and apply them to test cases in the Middle East and Asia"--Publisher
UR  - https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=390629
ER  -