TY  - BOOK
AU  - Gambier,Yves
AU  - Doorslaer,Luc van
TI  - The metalanguage of translation
T2  - Benjamins current topics,
SN  - 9789027288868
AV  - P306 .M453 2009eb
U1  - 418/.02 22
PY  - 2009///
CY  - Amsterdam, Philadelphia
PB  - John Benjamins Pub. Co.
KW  - Translating and interpreting
KW  - LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES
KW  - Translating & Interpreting
KW  - bisacsh
KW  - fast
KW  - Electronic books
N1  - Includes bibliographical references and index; How about meta?: an introduction / Yves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer -- Defining patterns in Translation Studies: revisiting two classics of German Translationswissenschaft / Gernot Hebenstreit -- Risking conceptual maps: mapping as a keywords-related tool underlying the online Translation Studies Bibliography / Luc van Doorslaer -- Polysemy and synonymy: their management in Translation Studies dictionaries and in translator training: a case study / Leona Van Vaerenbergh -- The terminology of translation: epistemological, conceptual and intercultural problems and their social consequences / Josep Marco -- Natural and directional equivalence in theories of translation / Anthony Pym -- A literary work, Translation and original: a conceptual analysis within the philosophy of art and Translation Studies / Leena Laiho -- 'What's in a name?': On metalinguistic confusion in Translation Studies / Mary Snell-Hornby -- In defence of fuzziness / Nike K. Pokorn -- The metalanguage of localization: theory and practice / Iwona Mazur -- The metalanguage of translation: a Chinese perspective / Jun Tang -- Translation terminology and its offshoots / Yves Gambier -- Subject index
N2  - "Let the meta-discussion begin," James Holmes urged in 1972. Coming almost forty years later - years filled with fascinating and often unexpected developments in the interdiscipline of Translation Studies - this volume offers the reader a multiplicity of meta-perspectives, while also moving the discussion forward. Indeed, the (re)production and (re)use of metalinguistic metaphors frame and partly determine our views on research, so such a discussion is vital ℗Ưas it is in any scholarly discipline. Among other questions, the eleven contributors draw the reader's attention to the often puzzling v
UR  - https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=298939
ER  -