TY - BOOK AU - Brata,Roby Arya TI - Why did anticorruption policy fail?: a study of anticorruption policy implementation failure in Indonesia T2 - Research in Public Management SN - 9781623967826 AV - HV6771.I5 .B738 2014eb U1 - 364.1323 23 PY - 2014/// CY - Charlotte, North Carolina PB - Information Age Publishing, Inc. KW - Corruption KW - Indonesia KW - Political corruption KW - Indonésie KW - Corruption (Politique) KW - SOCIAL SCIENCE KW - Criminology KW - bisacsh KW - fast KW - Electronic books N1 - Includes bibliographical references; Machine generated contents note; 1; Introduction --; Failed Anticorruption Measures in Indonesia --; Policy Evaluation Research Focus --; Purpose of the Study --; Theoretical Context and Gaps --; Central Policy Research Question --; Central Policy Argument --; Theoretical and Methodological Approaches --; Justification for the Study --; Theoretical and Policy Significance of the Study --; Organization of the Book --; 2; Explaining Anticorruption Implementation Failure --; Introduction --; Anticorruption: Why Anticorruption Policy Implementation Can Fail --; Defining Corruption --; Categorizing Anticorruption Strategies --; Assessing the Strategies --; Explaining Anticorruption Policy Failure --; Why Did Public Policy Implementation Fail? --; Definitions --; Competing Analytical Frameworks on Implementation --; Comparison and Integration of Failure Factor Typologies --; Theoretical Framework for the Study --; Conclusion --; 3; Evaluation Methodology --; Introduction --; Research Method --; Evaluating Policy Performance --; Nature, Aims, and Functions of Policy Evaluation --; Problems in Crime Control/Anticorruption Policy Evaluation --; Evaluation Method for the Study --; Evaluation Method Employed --; Justifying the Pre-judgment of Implementation Failure --; Criteria for Policy Evaluation --; Evaluation Criterion for the Study --; Sources of Data --; Primary Sources of Data --; Secondary Sources of Data --; Data-Collection Method --; Interview --; Document and Literature Analysis --; Sample Survey --; Data Analysis and Analytical Approach --; Theory-Informed Analysis --; Content Analysis --; Macro-Analytical Approach --; Integrated Implementation Analysis --; Maintaining Data Validity and Reliability --; Ethical Issues --; Limitations of the Study --; 4; Anticorruption Implementation Failure Under the Authoritarian New Order Regime --; Introduction --; Authoritarian Leadership --; Mapping the History of Anticorruption Measures of the New Order Regime --; Analysis of the Anticorruption Law 1971 --; Background --; Policy Objectives --; Scope and Definitions of Corruption --; Powers of the Implementing Agencies --; Specific Criminal Procedures --; Legal Sanctions --; Related Legislation --; Implementation Outcomes of the Anticorruption Law 1971 --; Public Perceptions on Bureaucratic Corruption Reduction --; Recovery of the State Assets Losses --; Public Confidence in the Criminal Justice System --; Changes in Anticorruption Attitudes --; Implementation Failure Factors of the Anticorruption Law 1971 --; Policy Design Factor --; Political Factor --; Institutional Factor --; Managerial Factor --; Societal Factor --; Implementation as an Integral Function of the Authoritarian Political System --; Conclusion --; 5; Anticorruption Implementation Failure Under the Democratic Reform Order Regime --; Introduction --; Democratic Political System: Reforming the Constitutional Power Structures and Relations --; Mapping the History of Anticorruption Measures of the Reform Order Regime --; Analysis ofthe Anticorruption Law 1999 --; Background --; Policy Objectives --; Scope and Definitions of Corruption --; Powers of the Implementing Agencies --; Specific Criminal Procedures --; Related Legislation --; Implementation Outcomes of the Anticorruption Law 1999 --; Public Perceptions on Bureaucratic Corruption Reduction --; Recovery of the State Assets Losses --; Public Confidence in the Capacity of the Criminal Justice System --; Changes in Anticorruption Attitudes --; Implementation Failure Factors of Anticorruption Law 1999 --; Policy Design Factor --; Political Factor --; Institutional Factor --; Managerial Factor --; Societal Factor --; Implementation as an Integral Function of the Political System of the Democratic Reform Governments --; Conclusions --; 6; Comparing the Anticorruption Implementation Failure Under Both Regimes --; Introduction --; Implementation Outcomes of the Anticorruption Laws --; Public Perceptions on Bureaucratic Corruption Reduction --; Recovery of the State Assets Losses --; Public Confidence in the Criminal Justice Systems --; Changes in Anticorruption Attitudes --; Implementation Factors of the Anticorruption Laws --; Policy Design Factors --; Implementation Structures and Processes of the Anticorruption Laws --; Powers of the Implementing Agencies --; Specific Criminal Procedures --; Political Factors --; Institutional Factors --; Managerial Factors --; Societal Factor --; Implementation as an Integral Function of the Authoritarian and Democratic Political Systems --; Conclusions --; 7; Conclusions and Policy Recommendations --; About the Case Studies --; Implementation Outcomes of the Anticorruption Laws --; Factors Contributing to the Implementation Failure --; Policy Design Factors --; Political Factors --; Institutional Factors --; Managerial Factors --; Societal Factors --; Defective Implementation Structures and Processes --; Implementation as an Integral Function of the Authoritarian and Democratic Political Systems --; Most Influential Factor(s), in Particular Those Factors Determining the Different Outcomes --; Theoretical Significance and Implications of the Study --; Agenda for Further Research --; Policy Significance and Recommendations --; Policy Design --; Political Policy --; Institutional Policy --; Management Policy --; Societal Empowerment Policy --; Political System Reform UR - https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=844899 ER -