TY  - BOOK
AU  - Watkins,Katherine
AU  - Burnam,M.Audrey
AU  - Okeke,Edward N.
AU  - Setodji,Claude Messan
ED  - RAND Health,
ED  - California Mental Health Services Authority,
TI  - Evaluating the impact of prevention and early intervention activities on the mental health of California's population
T2  - Technical report
SN  - 9780833078186
AV  - RC445.C2 E93 2012eb
U1  - 616 
PY  - 2012///
CY  - Santa Monica, CA
PB  - RAND Health
KW  - Mentally ill
KW  - Care
KW  - California
KW  - Statistics
KW  - Community mental health services
KW  - Outcome assessment (Medical care)
KW  - Mental Disorders
KW  - prevention & control
KW  - Mental Health Services
KW  - economics
KW  - Outcome Assessment, Health Care
KW  - State Government
KW  - Personnes vivant avec un trouble de santé mentale
KW  - Soins
KW  - Californie
KW  - Statistiques
KW  - Services communautaires de santé mentale
KW  - Évaluation des résultats (Soins médicaux)
KW  - HISTORY
KW  - United States
KW  - State & Local
KW  - West (AK, CA, CO, HI, ID, MT, NV, UT, WY)
KW  - bisacsh
KW  - HEALTH & FITNESS
KW  - Diseases
KW  - General
KW  - MEDICAL
KW  - Clinical Medicine
KW  - Evidence-Based Medicine
KW  - Internal Medicine
KW  - fast
KW  - Psychiatry
KW  - hilcc
KW  - Health & Biological Sciences
KW  - Psychiatry - General
KW  - Electronic books
KW  - gtlm
KW  - lcgft
KW  - rvmgf
N1  - Title from PDF title page; Includes bibliographical references; Ch. 1. Background -- ch. 2. Goals and approach -- ch. 3. Methods -- ch. 4. Evaluation frameworks -- ch. 5. Data sources and measure specifications -- ch. 6. Analytic approaches to evaluating the impact of prevention and early intervention programs -- ch. 7. Conclusions -- Appendix A. Framework logic models -- Appendix B. Database descriptions -- Appendix C. Measures descriptions -- Appendix D. Technical approach; Cover; Title Page; Copyright; Preface; Contents; Summary; Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; I. Background; II. Goals and Approach; III. Methods; Interviewing Key Stakeholders; Developing Frameworks; Identifying Databases; IV. Evaluation Frameworks; Overall Approach Framework; Figure 4.1 An Approach to Understanding the Impact of Statewide Prevention and Early Intervention Funding; Outcome-Specific Frameworks; Figure 4.2 Suicide-Prevention Framework; Figure 4.3 Reduced-Suffering Framework; V. Data Sources and Measures Specifications; VI. Analytic Approaches to Evaluating the Impact of PEI; Time-Trend Analysis of Observational Data (Before-and-After Design)Difference-in-Differences Design; Table 6.1 An Illustration of the Difference-in-Differences Design: Suicide Rates (%); Synthetic Control Method; Using Descriptive Statistics for Inference; VII. Conclusions; Usefulness of the Evaluation Framework; Applying the Framework to the Broader Evaluation of the Mental Health Services Act; Data Development; Other Important Evaluation Issues; Next Steps; A. Framework Logic Models; B. Database Descriptions; C. Measures Descriptions; D. Technical Approach; Technical Details of a Time-Trend Analysis of Pooled Cross-Sectional DataAnalytic Methods for Longitudinal or Pooled Cross-Sectional Observations with No Baseline; Technical Details of Synthetic Control Design; Limitations; References
N2  - In 2004, California voters passed the Mental Health Services Act, which was intended to transform California's community mental health system from a crisis-driven system to one that included a focus on prevention and wellness. The vision was that prevention and early intervention (PEI) services comprised the first step in a continuum of services designed to identify early symptoms and prevent mental illness from becoming severe and disabling. Twenty percent of the act's funding was dedicated to PEI services. The act identified seven negative outcomes that PEI programs were intended to reduce: suicide, mental health-related incarcerations, school failure, unemployment, prolonged suffering, homelessness, and removal of children from the home. The Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission (MHSOAC) coordinated with the California Mental Health Services Authority (CalMHSA), an independent administrative and fiscal intergovernmental agency, to seek development of a statewide framework for evaluating and monitoring the short- and long-term impact of PEI funding on the population. CalMHSA selected the RAND Corporation to develop a framework for the statewide evaluation. This report describes the approach, the data sources, and the frameworks developed: an overall approach framework and outcome-specific frameworks
UR  - https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=608682
ER  -