TY  - BOOK
AU  - Ellis,Ralph D.
AU  - Zachar,Peter
TI  - Categorical versus dimensional models of affect: a seminar on the theories of Panksepp and Russell 
T2  - Consciousness & Emotion Book Series
SN  - 9789027274755
AV  - BF175.5.A35 C38 2012eb
U1  - 152.4 23
PY  - 2012///
CY  - Amsterdam, Philadelphia
PB  - John Benjamins Pub. Co.
KW  - Affect (Psychology)
KW  - Emotions
KW  - FAMILY & RELATIONSHIPS
KW  - Death, Grief, Bereavement
KW  - bisacsh
KW  - PSYCHOLOGY
KW  - fast
KW  - Electronic books
N1  - Includes bibliographical references and index; Categorical versus Dimensional Models of Affect; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; 1. Introduction; 2. An intellectual biography of Jaak Panksepp; 3. An intellectual biography of James Russell; 4. What is at stake in this scientific debate about affect?; 5. The plan of the book and chapter summaries; References; 2. In defense of multiple Core Affects; 2. How does affect relate to prototypical emotional episodes?; 3. What kind of affect might be had by other mammals and/or human infants?; 4. How can we infer affect from observation of behavior?
N2  - One of the most important theoretical and empirical issues in the scholarly study of emotion is whether there is a correct list of "basic" types of affect or whether all affective states are better modeled as a combination of locations on shared underlying dimensions. Many thinkers have written on this topic, yet the views of two scientists in particular are dominant. The first is Jaak Panksepp, the father of Affective Neuroscience. Panksepp conceptualizes affect as a set of distinct categories. The leading proponent of the dimensional approach in scientific psychology is James Russell. According to Russell all affect can be decomposed into two underlying dimensions, pleasure versus displeasure and low arousal versus high arousal. In this volume Panksepp and Russell each articulate their positions on eleven fundamental questions about the nature of affect followed by a discussion of these target papers by noted emotion theorists and researchers. Russell and Panksepp respond both to each other and to the commentators. The discussion leads to some stark contrasts, with formidable arguments on both sides, and some interesting convergences between the two streams of work
UR  - https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=461599
ER  -