Writing Death

By: Contributor(s): Material type: ArticleArticleLanguage: English Publication details: Brooklyn, NY punctum books 2011Description: 1 electronic resource (114 p.)ISBN:
  • P3.0214.1.00
Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: Writing Death opens a meditation on the possibility of mourning; of whether there is a subject, or even object, that one mourns-of whether one is mourning, can only mourn, the very impossibility of mourning itself. The manuscript is framed by two attempts at mourning-Avital Ronell's "The Tactlessness of an Unending Fadeout" and Jeremy Fernando's "adieu." In-between-for this is where both pieces posit the possibility of attending to the passing, the memory, the fading of the person-is an attempt to think this impossibility. The text is continually haunted by the question of whether one is mourning the person as such, or a particular version of the person, a reading of the person. And in reading another, in attempting to respond to the other, one can never have the metaphysical comfort that one is reading accurately, correctly; in fact, one may always already be re-writing the person. Thus, all one can do is attempt to mourn the name of that person, whilst never being certain of whether her name even refers to her any longer. All one can do is write death.
Item type:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Home library Collection Call number Materials specified Status Date due Barcode
Electronic-Books Electronic-Books OPJGU Sonepat- Campus E-Books Open Access Available

Open Access star Unrestricted online access

Writing Death opens a meditation on the possibility of mourning; of whether there is a subject, or even object, that one mourns-of whether one is mourning, can only mourn, the very impossibility of mourning itself. The manuscript is framed by two attempts at mourning-Avital Ronell's "The Tactlessness of an Unending Fadeout" and Jeremy Fernando's "adieu." In-between-for this is where both pieces posit the possibility of attending to the passing, the memory, the fading of the person-is an attempt to think this impossibility. The text is continually haunted by the question of whether one is mourning the person as such, or a particular version of the person, a reading of the person. And in reading another, in attempting to respond to the other, one can never have the metaphysical comfort that one is reading accurately, correctly; in fact, one may always already be re-writing the person. Thus, all one can do is attempt to mourn the name of that person, whilst never being certain of whether her name even refers to her any longer. All one can do is write death.

Creative Commons https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ cc https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/

English

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonepat-Narela Road, Sonepat, Haryana (India) - 131001

Send your feedback to glus@jgu.edu.in

Hosted, Implemented & Customized by: BestBookBuddies   |   Maintained by: Global Library