The reasons requirement in international investment arbitration : critical case studies / Guillermo Aguilar Alvarez, W. Michael Reisman, editors.

Contributor(s):

Material type: Text

text

Media type:

computer

Carrier type:

online resource

ISBN:

9789047440314
9047440315
1282398334
9781282398337
9786612398339
6612398337

Subject(s): Genre/Form:

Additional physical formats: Print version:: Reasons requirement in international investment arbitration.DDC classification:

346.07 22

LOC classification:

K3830 .R43 2008eb

Online resources:

Click here to access online

Contents:

How well are investment rewards reasoned? / Guillermo Aguilar Alvarez and W. Michael Reisman -- The final award in Mondev International v. United States of America / Julien Cantegreil -- The final award in Feldman v. Mexico / Dennis Clare -- The decision on liability in LG & E v. Argentina / Rocío Digón -- The award in Saluka Investments v. Czech Republic / George Stephanov Georgiev -- The decision on jurisdiction in Tokios Tokeles v. Ukraine / Nartnirun Junngam -- The final award in Occidental v. Ecuador / Aloysius P. Llamzon -- The awards in Wena Hotels Limited v. Arab Republic of Egypt / Julie Maupin -- The award in Thunderbird v. Mexico / Santiago Montt -- The final award in Loewen v. United States / Dirk Pulkowski -- The award in Petrobart Limited v. Kyrgyz Republic / Galina Zukova.

Summary: This collection of essays emerged from a seminar on international investment law taught jointly by the editors at the Yale Law School . The participants brought a rich experience and, as important for a subject like this, a rich national diversity. A considerable part of the seminar involved close reading of recent international investment arbitral awards. These decisions have emerged as the most important engines of legal development in this field. Interestingly, in almost all instances, it was felt that the right decision had been reached. But without the building blocks that reasons reflect, one could not reconstruct or "reverse engineer" the reasoning of the tribunal. From this experience, it was concluded that it would be a useful exercise to examine the adequacy of reasons in some of the most important recent international investment law awards in order to see if there were significant trends with policy implications. The studies in this collection represent the best of the seminar.

Item type:

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings
Item type	Home library	Collection	Call number	Materials specified	Status	Date due	Barcode
Electronic-Books	OPJGU Sonepat- Campus	E-Books EBSCO			Available

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Print version record.

This collection of essays emerged from a seminar on international investment law taught jointly by the editors at the Yale Law School . The participants brought a rich experience and, as important for a subject like this, a rich national diversity. A considerable part of the seminar involved close reading of recent international investment arbitral awards. These decisions have emerged as the most important engines of legal development in this field. Interestingly, in almost all instances, it was felt that the right decision had been reached. But without the building blocks that reasons reflect, one could not reconstruct or "reverse engineer" the reasoning of the tribunal. From this experience, it was concluded that it would be a useful exercise to examine the adequacy of reasons in some of the most important recent international investment law awards in order to see if there were significant trends with policy implications. The studies in this collection represent the best of the seminar.

English.

eBooks on EBSCOhost EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.