That eminent tribunal : judicial supremacy and the constitution / Christopher Wolfe, editor.
Material type:![Text](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/BK.png)
- text
- computer
- online resource
- 9781400826285
- 1400826284
- 9780691116679
- 0691116679
- 9780691116686
- 0691116687
- 1282087053
- 9781282087057
- 9786612087059
- 6612087056
- United States. Supreme Court
- États-Unis. Supreme Court
- United States. Supreme Court
- Judicial power -- United States
- Judge-made law -- United States
- Constitutional law -- United States
- Pouvoir judiciaire -- États-Unis
- Droit créé par le juge -- États-Unis
- Droit constitutionnel -- États-Unis
- POLITICAL SCIENCE -- Government -- Judicial Branch
- LAW -- Legal Services
- LAW -- Civil Procedure
- POLITICAL SCIENCE -- American Government -- Judicial Branch
- Constitutional law
- Judge-made law
- Judicial power
- United States
- 347.73/12 22
- KF5130 .T48 2004eb
Item type | Home library | Collection | Call number | Materials specified | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
OPJGU Sonepat- Campus | E-Books EBSCO | Available |
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Is the Constitution whatever the winners say it is? / Gerard V. Bradley -- Nationhood and judicial supremacy / Robert F. Nagel -- Casey at the bat--taking another swing at Planned Parenthood v. Casey / Michael Zuckert -- Antijural jurisprudence : the vices of the judges enter a new stage / Hadley Arkes -- Judicial power and the withering of civil society / George W. Liebmann -- The academy, the courts, and the culture of rationalism / Steven D. Smith -- Judicial moral expertise and real-world constraints on judicial moral reasoning / Jack Wade Nowlin -- Toward a more balanced history of the Supreme Court / Michael W. McConnell -- Judicial review and republican government / Jeremy Waldron -- The Casey Five versus the Federalism Five : supreme legislator or prudent umpire? / Keith E. Whittington -- The Rhenquist Court and "conservative judicial activism" / Christopher Wolfe.
The role of the United States Supreme Court has been deeply controversial throughout American history. Should the Court undertake the task of guarding a wide variety of controversial and often unenumerated rights? Or should it confine itself to enforcing specific constitutional provisions, leaving other issues (even those of rights) to the democratic process?
Print version record.
English.
eBooks on EBSCOhost EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide
There are no comments on this title.