Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Locke and the legislative point of view : toleration, contested principles, and law / Alex Tuckness.

By: Material type: TextTextPublication details: Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, ©2002.Description: 1 online resource (xiii, 206 pages)Content type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9781400825394
  • 1400825393
Subject(s): Genre/Form: Additional physical formats: Print version:: Locke and the legislative point of view.DDC classification:
  • 172/.2 22
LOC classification:
  • JC153.L87 T83 2002eb
Online resources:
Contents:
pt. 1. The legislative point of view and the ends of government. Contested laws and principles : Contested principles and the legislative point of view ; The analogy between laws and moral principles -- Contested principles and legislative point of view. Rule-utilitarianism and contested principles ; Locke, Proast, and contested principles ; The secular analogue of the Lockean argument ; Two illustrations -- Legislative consent and the public good. Problems with contractual consent ; Locke's legislative consent and the public good -- Beyond neutrality and perfectionism. Two liberal approaches ; Rawls and responsible agreement ; Raz and human well-being ; Beyond neutrality and perfectionism -- pt. 2. The legislative point of view. Institutional roles and the legislative point of view. Locke on legislative and executive powers ; Locke and the missing judicial power ; Judges as legislators : functions versus institutions ; Implications for contested roles -- Contested roles, interpretation, and the framer's point of view. Contested jurisdiction and the "framer's point of view" ; Contested constitutional jurisdiction in the United States ; Dworkin and the legislative point of view ; Originalism and the nature of law and legislation ; Boerne v. Flores ; Contested roles and the state of nature ; Conclusion -- Appendix 1 : Textual support for the legislature point of view -- Appendix 2. Locke's theory of consent and the ends of government.
Summary: Determining which moral principles should guide political action is a vexing question in political theory. This is especially true when faced with the "toleration paradox": believing that something is morally wrong but also believing that it is wrong to suppress it. In this book, Alex Tuckness argues that John Locke's potential contribution to this debate--what Tuckness terms the "legislative point of view"--Has long been obscured by overemphasis on his doctrine of consent. Building on a line of reasoning Locke made explicit in his later writings on religious toleration, Tuckness explores the.
Item type:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Home library Collection Call number Materials specified Status Date due Barcode
Electronic-Books Electronic-Books OPJGU Sonepat- Campus E-Books EBSCO Available

Includes bibliographical references and index.

pt. 1. The legislative point of view and the ends of government. Contested laws and principles : Contested principles and the legislative point of view ; The analogy between laws and moral principles -- Contested principles and legislative point of view. Rule-utilitarianism and contested principles ; Locke, Proast, and contested principles ; The secular analogue of the Lockean argument ; Two illustrations -- Legislative consent and the public good. Problems with contractual consent ; Locke's legislative consent and the public good -- Beyond neutrality and perfectionism. Two liberal approaches ; Rawls and responsible agreement ; Raz and human well-being ; Beyond neutrality and perfectionism -- pt. 2. The legislative point of view. Institutional roles and the legislative point of view. Locke on legislative and executive powers ; Locke and the missing judicial power ; Judges as legislators : functions versus institutions ; Implications for contested roles -- Contested roles, interpretation, and the framer's point of view. Contested jurisdiction and the "framer's point of view" ; Contested constitutional jurisdiction in the United States ; Dworkin and the legislative point of view ; Originalism and the nature of law and legislation ; Boerne v. Flores ; Contested roles and the state of nature ; Conclusion -- Appendix 1 : Textual support for the legislature point of view -- Appendix 2. Locke's theory of consent and the ends of government.

Determining which moral principles should guide political action is a vexing question in political theory. This is especially true when faced with the "toleration paradox": believing that something is morally wrong but also believing that it is wrong to suppress it. In this book, Alex Tuckness argues that John Locke's potential contribution to this debate--what Tuckness terms the "legislative point of view"--Has long been obscured by overemphasis on his doctrine of consent. Building on a line of reasoning Locke made explicit in his later writings on religious toleration, Tuckness explores the.

Print version record.

eBooks on EBSCOhost EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonepat-Narela Road, Sonepat, Haryana (India) - 131001

Send your feedback to glus@jgu.edu.in

Hosted, Implemented & Customized by: BestBookBuddies   |   Maintained by: Global Library