The Habermas-Rawls debate / James Gordon Finlayson
Material type:![Text](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/BK.png)
- text
- computer
- online resource
- 0231549016
- 9780231549011
- 193 23
- B3258.H324
Item type | Home library | Collection | Call number | Materials specified | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
OPJGU Sonepat- Campus | E-Books EBSCO | Available |
Includes bibliographical references and index
Print version record
In the 1990s, Jürgen Habermas and John Rawls had a famous exchange in the Journal of Philosophy. In this book, James Gordon Finlayson examines the Habermas-Rawls debate in context and considers its wider implications
Much ado about nothing -- Early debate -- Two nonrival theories of justice -- Habermas's early criticisms of Rawls -- Habermas's and Rawls's mature political theories -- Habermas between facts and norms -- Rawls's political liberalism -- The exchange -- Reconciliation through the public use of reason -- Reply to Habermas -- Reasonable versus true -- The legacy of the Habermas-Rawls dispute -- Religion in the bounds of public reason alone
eBooks on EBSCOhost EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide
There are no comments on this title.