Right not to be criminalized demarcating criminal law`s authority
Material type:![Text](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/BK.png)
- 9781409427650
- 345.001 22 BA-R
- K5018 .B34 2011
![](/opac-tmpl/bootstrap/itemtypeimg/bridge/book.png)
Item type | Home library | Collection | Shelving location | Call number | Materials specified | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
OPJGU Sonepat- Campus | General Books | Main Library | 345.001 BA-R (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 117802 |
Browsing OPJGU Sonepat- Campus shelves, Collection: General Books Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
345.001 AC- Action and value in criminal law | 345.001 AL-C Crime and culpability : a theory of criminal law / | 345.001 AL-R Reflections on crime and culpability problems and puzzles | 345.001 BA-R Right not to be criminalized demarcating criminal law`s authority | 345.001 BA-T Theory and practice of international criminal law essays in honor of M Cherif Bassiouni | 345.001 CR- Criminal law and economics | 345.001 CR- Criminal justice |
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Unprincipled criminalization -- The problem: unprincipled criminalization -- The right not to be criminalized -- The retributive foundations of individualized criminalization -- Principled criminalization -- The structure of this book -- Taking harm seriously as a fairness constraint -- Harm and wrongdoing -- Feinberg's account of objectively wrongful harm -- Wronging non-human animals -- Non-objective and objective conceptions of harm -- Constitutionalizing the harm principle -- Wrongful harm as a normative justification for penal detention -- Distinguishing criminal harm from private law harm: culpability and collective enforcement -- The moral dimensions of constitutional rights -- Harm as a constitutional requirement -- Can courts determine objective accounts of harm? -- Drawing the line -- The limits of remote harm and endangerment criminalization -- Criminal responsibility for the acts of another -- Empirical evidence of remote harmfulness -- Fairly imputing aggregate harm to individuals -- Endangerment as a justification for criminalizing gun possession -- Conclusion -- The harm principle vs. Kantian criteria for ensuring fair criminalization -- Kantian criteria for ensuring fair criminalization -- Kant's second formulation of the categorical imperative -- Dan-Cohen and Ripstein's criticisms of the harm principle -- Harm and wrongdoing to non-humans -- Ripstein's sovereignty principle -- The moral limits of consent as a defense to criminal harm doing -- Objectivity and consent -- Harm and consent: stubborn counterexamples -- Objectivity and the limits of consent in R.V. Konzani -- Objectivity and wanton use of humans -- Other normative considerations -- Criminalizing harmless wrongs -- The hollowness of Feinberg's offense principle -- Feinberg's mediating maxims and critical morality -- The vacuity of moral realism as an explanation of criminalization's normativity -- Conventionally contingent harms -- The normative badness of offense doing -- The wrongness of conventionally contingent bad acts -- Conclusion.
There are no comments on this title.