Justifying intellectual property /
Merges, Robert P.,
Justifying intellectual property / Robert P. Merges. - Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press, 2011. - 1 online resource (xiv, 405 pages) : illustrations -
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Introduction : Main themes -- Locke -- Kant -- Distributive justice and IP rights -- Midlevel principles of IP law -- The proportionality principle -- Creative professionals, corporate ownership, and transaction costs -- Property in the digital era -- Patents and drugs for the developing world-- Conclusion : The future of property.
In a sophisticated defense of intellectual property, Merges draws on Kant, Locke, and Rawls to explain how IP rights are based on a solid ethical foundation and make sense for a just society. He also calls for appropriate boundaries: IP rights are real, but they come with real limits. Why should a property interest exist in an intangible item? In recent years, arguments over intellectual property have often divided proponents--who emphasize the importance of providing incentives for producers of creative works-- from skeptics who emphasize the need for free and open access to knowledge. In a wide-ranging and ambitious analysis, Robert P. Merges establishes a sophisticated rationale for the most vital form of modern property: IP rights. His insightful new book answers the many critics who contend that these rights are inefficient, unfair, and theoretically incoherent. But Merges' vigorous defense of IP is also a call for appropriate legal constraints and boundaries: IP rights are real, but they come with real limits. Drawing on Kant, Locke, and Rawls as well as contemporary scholars, Merges crafts an original theory to explain why IP rights make sense as a reward for effort and as a way to encourage individuals to strive. He also provides a novel explanation of why awarding IP rights to creative people is fair for everyone else in society, by contributing to a just distribution of resources. Merges argues convincingly that IP rights are based on a solid ethical foundation, and--when subject to fair limits--these rights are an indispensable part of a well-functioning society.
English.
9780674061125 (electronic bk.) 0674061128 (electronic bk.)
22573/ctt1j3nhb JSTOR
015767040 Uk
Intellectual property--Philosophy.
Intangible property--Philosophy.
Propriété intellectuelle--Philosophie.
LAW--Business & Financial.
LAW--Intellectual Property--General.
LAW--Property.
Intellectual property--Philosophy.
Immaterialgüterrecht
Rechtsphilosophie
Rechtstheorie
Immaterialgüterrecht.
Rechtsphilosophie.
Rechtstheorie.
Upphovsrätt.
Electronic books.
Electronic books.
Electronic books.
K1401 / .M475 2011eb
346.04/8
Justifying intellectual property / Robert P. Merges. - Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press, 2011. - 1 online resource (xiv, 405 pages) : illustrations -
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Introduction : Main themes -- Locke -- Kant -- Distributive justice and IP rights -- Midlevel principles of IP law -- The proportionality principle -- Creative professionals, corporate ownership, and transaction costs -- Property in the digital era -- Patents and drugs for the developing world-- Conclusion : The future of property.
In a sophisticated defense of intellectual property, Merges draws on Kant, Locke, and Rawls to explain how IP rights are based on a solid ethical foundation and make sense for a just society. He also calls for appropriate boundaries: IP rights are real, but they come with real limits. Why should a property interest exist in an intangible item? In recent years, arguments over intellectual property have often divided proponents--who emphasize the importance of providing incentives for producers of creative works-- from skeptics who emphasize the need for free and open access to knowledge. In a wide-ranging and ambitious analysis, Robert P. Merges establishes a sophisticated rationale for the most vital form of modern property: IP rights. His insightful new book answers the many critics who contend that these rights are inefficient, unfair, and theoretically incoherent. But Merges' vigorous defense of IP is also a call for appropriate legal constraints and boundaries: IP rights are real, but they come with real limits. Drawing on Kant, Locke, and Rawls as well as contemporary scholars, Merges crafts an original theory to explain why IP rights make sense as a reward for effort and as a way to encourage individuals to strive. He also provides a novel explanation of why awarding IP rights to creative people is fair for everyone else in society, by contributing to a just distribution of resources. Merges argues convincingly that IP rights are based on a solid ethical foundation, and--when subject to fair limits--these rights are an indispensable part of a well-functioning society.
English.
9780674061125 (electronic bk.) 0674061128 (electronic bk.)
22573/ctt1j3nhb JSTOR
015767040 Uk
Intellectual property--Philosophy.
Intangible property--Philosophy.
Propriété intellectuelle--Philosophie.
LAW--Business & Financial.
LAW--Intellectual Property--General.
LAW--Property.
Intellectual property--Philosophy.
Immaterialgüterrecht
Rechtsphilosophie
Rechtstheorie
Immaterialgüterrecht.
Rechtsphilosophie.
Rechtstheorie.
Upphovsrätt.
Electronic books.
Electronic books.
Electronic books.
K1401 / .M475 2011eb
346.04/8