How the gloves came off : lawyers, policy makers, and norms in the debate on torture /
Arsenault, Elizabeth Grimm,
How the gloves came off : lawyers, policy makers, and norms in the debate on torture / Elizabeth Grimm Arsenault. - 1 online resource (267 pages). - Columbia studies in terrorism and irregular warfare . - Columbia studies in terrorism and irregular warfare. .
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Introduction -- History of POW treatment in the United States: from the Revolutionary War to the Korean War -- Modern POW treatment in the United States: the Vietnam War, the Geneva Conventions, and the pre-9/11 era -- POW treatment and lawyers -- POW treatment and policy makers -- POW treatment and interrogators -- Implications and recommendations.
"The treatment of detainees at Abu Ghraib prison, Guantánamo Bay, and far-flung CIA 'black sites' after the attacks of 9/11 included cruelty that defied legal and normative prohibitions in U.S. and international law. The antitorture stance of the United States was brushed aside. Since then, the guarantee of American civil liberties and due process for POWs and detainees has grown muddled, threatening the norms that sustain modern democracies. 'How the Gloves Came Off' considers the legal and political arguments that led to this standoff between civility and chaos and their significant consequences for the strategic interests and standing of the United States. Unpacking the rhetoric surrounding the push for unitary executive action in wartime, 'How the Gloves Came Off' traces the unmaking of the consensus against torture. It implicates U.S. military commanders, high-level government administrators, lawyers, and policy makers from both parties, exposing the ease with which powerful actors manipulated ambiguities to strip detainees of their humanity. By targeting the language and logic that made torture thinkable, this book shows how future decision makers can craft an effective counternarrative and set a new course for U.S. policy toward POWs and detainees. Whether leaders use their influence to reinforce a prohibition of cruelty to prisoners or continue to undermine long-standing international law will determine whether the United States retains a core component of its founding identity."--JSTOR website (viewed February 24, 2017).
In English.
9780231543255 (electronic bk.) 0231543255 (electronic bk.) (hardcover ; alkaline paper) (hardcover ; alkaline paper)
10.7312/arse18078 doi
22573/ctt1kn263x JSTOR 28FF53E5-EB27-48AA-A5A6-881E21642201 OverDrive, Inc. http://www.overdrive.com
2016034286
Torture--Government policy--United States.
Prisoners of war--History.--United States
HISTORY--Military--Afghan War (2001- )
Prisoners of war.
Torture--Government policy.
United States.
Electronic books.
History.
Electronic books.
HV8599.U6 / A77 2017
364.6/7
How the gloves came off : lawyers, policy makers, and norms in the debate on torture / Elizabeth Grimm Arsenault. - 1 online resource (267 pages). - Columbia studies in terrorism and irregular warfare . - Columbia studies in terrorism and irregular warfare. .
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Introduction -- History of POW treatment in the United States: from the Revolutionary War to the Korean War -- Modern POW treatment in the United States: the Vietnam War, the Geneva Conventions, and the pre-9/11 era -- POW treatment and lawyers -- POW treatment and policy makers -- POW treatment and interrogators -- Implications and recommendations.
"The treatment of detainees at Abu Ghraib prison, Guantánamo Bay, and far-flung CIA 'black sites' after the attacks of 9/11 included cruelty that defied legal and normative prohibitions in U.S. and international law. The antitorture stance of the United States was brushed aside. Since then, the guarantee of American civil liberties and due process for POWs and detainees has grown muddled, threatening the norms that sustain modern democracies. 'How the Gloves Came Off' considers the legal and political arguments that led to this standoff between civility and chaos and their significant consequences for the strategic interests and standing of the United States. Unpacking the rhetoric surrounding the push for unitary executive action in wartime, 'How the Gloves Came Off' traces the unmaking of the consensus against torture. It implicates U.S. military commanders, high-level government administrators, lawyers, and policy makers from both parties, exposing the ease with which powerful actors manipulated ambiguities to strip detainees of their humanity. By targeting the language and logic that made torture thinkable, this book shows how future decision makers can craft an effective counternarrative and set a new course for U.S. policy toward POWs and detainees. Whether leaders use their influence to reinforce a prohibition of cruelty to prisoners or continue to undermine long-standing international law will determine whether the United States retains a core component of its founding identity."--JSTOR website (viewed February 24, 2017).
In English.
9780231543255 (electronic bk.) 0231543255 (electronic bk.) (hardcover ; alkaline paper) (hardcover ; alkaline paper)
10.7312/arse18078 doi
22573/ctt1kn263x JSTOR 28FF53E5-EB27-48AA-A5A6-881E21642201 OverDrive, Inc. http://www.overdrive.com
2016034286
Torture--Government policy--United States.
Prisoners of war--History.--United States
HISTORY--Military--Afghan War (2001- )
Prisoners of war.
Torture--Government policy.
United States.
Electronic books.
History.
Electronic books.
HV8599.U6 / A77 2017
364.6/7