Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Student First Amendment Speech and Expression Rights : Armbands to Bong HiTS.

By: Material type: TextTextSeries: Recht und GesellschaftPublication details: El Paso : LFB Scholarly Pub. LLC, 2011.Description: 1 online resource (193 pages)Content type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9781593326937
  • 1593326939
Subject(s): Genre/Form: Additional physical formats: Print version:: Student First Amendment Speech and Expression Rights : Armbands to Bong HiTS.DDC classification:
  • 342.7308/5 342.73085
LOC classification:
  • KF4770 .R36 2011
Online resources:
Contents:
PART I. Opening the School House Gates; CHAPTER 1. Wearing Tinker's Armband; CHAPTER 2. Matthew Fraser: Lewd or Just Funny?; CHAPTER 3. Extra Extra!!! The Administration Decides if YouRead all about It!; CHAPTER 4. Back to Black; CHAPTER 5. No Bong HiTS for Students ... or Jesus; PART II. Beyond Armbands, Bong HiTS, and Assemblies; CHAPTER 6. Broadly Defining Co-Curricular and School-Sponsored Activities; CHAPTER 7. Distribution of Student-Published or PromotedMaterials; CHAPTER 8. Classroom and Curricular Activities.
CHAPTER 9. Student Campaigns, Elections, Protests and otherPolitical SpeechCHAPTER 10. The Student Athlete and Free Speech; CHAPTER 11. (Not) Saying the Pledge of Allegiance; CHAPTER 12. Confederate Flags, Coed Naked, and Heavy MetalIcons: What Not to Wear to School; CHAPTER 13. BF4eva ;) -- Student Posting, Texting, andBlogging -- LOL ... ; CHAPTER 14. Free Speech or Free from Potential Harm; PART III. CHAPTER 15. Touring the Student Speech andExpression Legal Landscape; References; Index.
Summary: Ramey examines the legal boundaries of student speech and expression rights in school, as developed and defined by the U.S. federal courts. At issue is the proper extent of student speech and expressive conduct protected under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The purpose of discussing these decisions is to better enable educators to make informed decisions regarding student speech and expression in school. Ramey focuses on the Supreme Court?s four main student speech and expression decisions: in Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. Sch. Dist. (1969), Bethel Sch. Dist. v. Fraser (1986), Haz.
Item type:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Home library Collection Call number Materials specified Status Date due Barcode
Electronic-Books Electronic-Books OPJGU Sonepat- Campus E-Books EBSCO Available

PART I. Opening the School House Gates; CHAPTER 1. Wearing Tinker's Armband; CHAPTER 2. Matthew Fraser: Lewd or Just Funny?; CHAPTER 3. Extra Extra!!! The Administration Decides if YouRead all about It!; CHAPTER 4. Back to Black; CHAPTER 5. No Bong HiTS for Students ... or Jesus; PART II. Beyond Armbands, Bong HiTS, and Assemblies; CHAPTER 6. Broadly Defining Co-Curricular and School-Sponsored Activities; CHAPTER 7. Distribution of Student-Published or PromotedMaterials; CHAPTER 8. Classroom and Curricular Activities.

CHAPTER 9. Student Campaigns, Elections, Protests and otherPolitical SpeechCHAPTER 10. The Student Athlete and Free Speech; CHAPTER 11. (Not) Saying the Pledge of Allegiance; CHAPTER 12. Confederate Flags, Coed Naked, and Heavy MetalIcons: What Not to Wear to School; CHAPTER 13. BF4eva ;) -- Student Posting, Texting, andBlogging -- LOL ... ; CHAPTER 14. Free Speech or Free from Potential Harm; PART III. CHAPTER 15. Touring the Student Speech andExpression Legal Landscape; References; Index.

Ramey examines the legal boundaries of student speech and expression rights in school, as developed and defined by the U.S. federal courts. At issue is the proper extent of student speech and expressive conduct protected under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The purpose of discussing these decisions is to better enable educators to make informed decisions regarding student speech and expression in school. Ramey focuses on the Supreme Court?s four main student speech and expression decisions: in Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. Sch. Dist. (1969), Bethel Sch. Dist. v. Fraser (1986), Haz.

Print version record.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

English.

eBooks on EBSCOhost EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonepat-Narela Road, Sonepat, Haryana (India) - 131001

Send your feedback to glus@jgu.edu.in

Hosted, Implemented & Customized by: BestBookBuddies   |   Maintained by: Global Library