Planning America's security : lessons from the National Defense Panel / John E. Tedstrom, John G. McGinn.
Material type: TextPublication details: Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 1999.Description: 1 online resource (xi, 22 pages)Content type:- text
- computer
- online resource
- 0585239606
- 9780585239606
- United States. National Defense Panel
- United States. National Defense Panel
- Military planning -- United States
- National security -- United States
- Planification militaire -- États-Unis
- TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING -- Military Science
- HISTORY -- Military -- Other
- Military planning
- National security
- United States
- Sicherheitspolitik
- USA
- Military & Naval Science
- Law, Politics & Government
- Armies
- 355/.033073 21
- UA23 .T383 1999eb
- digitized 2010 HathiTrust Digital Library committed to preserve
Item type | Home library | Collection | Call number | Materials specified | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic-Books | OPJGU Sonepat- Campus | E-Books EBSCO | Available |
"Prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense."
"National Defense Research Institute."
At head of title: Rand.
"MR-1049-OSD"--Page 4 of cover.
Includes bibliographical references.
Open access Unrestricted online access star
This report identifies key lessons from the first National Defense Panel (NDP) and makes recommendations to the Congress, the administration, and future NDP management teams about how the process can be made more effective. The NDP was established by the 1996 Military Force Structure Review Act as an independent effort to provide guidance to the Secretary of Defense and the Congress on long-term defense strategies and force structure requirements. This report reviews the motivations for creating the NDP, its administrative and logistical experience, the NDP's relationship to the Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR), and the final NDP report. Some of the principal recommendations are that (1) the NDP should maintain its focus on defense issues, but do more to integrate its recommendations into the broader national security agenda; (2) future NDPs should be better coordinated with the defense planning cycle (i.e., the next NDP, preceding the next QDR, should complete its work before the new administration comes into office in 2001); and (3) future NDPs should deal more systematically with resource constraints than the first NDP.
Use copy Restrictions unspecified star MiAaHDL
Electronic reproduction. [S.l.] : HathiTrust Digital Library, 2010. MiAaHDL
Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002. MiAaHDL
http://purl.oclc.org/DLF/benchrepro0212
digitized 2010 HathiTrust Digital Library committed to preserve pda MiAaHDL
Print version record.
English.
eBooks on EBSCOhost EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide
There are no comments on this title.