Dialogue among state supreme courts : advancing state constitutionalism / Mark W. Denniston.

By:

Denniston, Mark W, 1975-

Material type: Text

TextSeries: Law and Society : Recent ScholarshipPublisher: El Paso : LFB Scholarly Pub. LLC, 2014Description: 1 online resourceContent type:

text

Media type:

computer

Carrier type:

online resource

ISBN:

9781593327927
1593327927

Subject(s):

Genre/Form:

Additional physical formats: Print version:: Dialogue among state supreme courtsDDC classification:

342.7308 23

LOC classification:

KF4530 .D465 2014eb

Online resources:

Click here to access online

Contents:

Describing dialogue -- Ohio case study -- Developing a nine state research design -- Reporting the empirical results -- Sister state dialogue and the good faith exception -- Interviews with state supreme court justices -- Challenges and future research.

Summary: State supreme courts use state constitutional provisions to afford their citizens state constitutional rights beyond the protections that the U.S. Supreme Court has interpreted the U.S. Constitution to require. As state supreme courts consider expanding state constitutional rights they engage in an ongoing dialogue with their sister state supreme courts. Results indicate this dialogue amongst state supreme courts influences decisions interpreting state constitutional rights. Denniston demonstrates through analysis of state supreme court decisions and interviews with state supreme court justice.

Item type:

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings
Item type	Home library	Collection	Call number	Materials specified	Status	Date due	Barcode
Electronic-Books	OPJGU Sonepat- Campus	E-Books EBSCO			Available

Based on the author's thesis (doctoral - University of Colorado at Boulder), 2012.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Print version record.

State supreme courts use state constitutional provisions to afford their citizens state constitutional rights beyond the protections that the U.S. Supreme Court has interpreted the U.S. Constitution to require. As state supreme courts consider expanding state constitutional rights they engage in an ongoing dialogue with their sister state supreme courts. Results indicate this dialogue amongst state supreme courts influences decisions interpreting state constitutional rights. Denniston demonstrates through analysis of state supreme court decisions and interviews with state supreme court justice.

eBooks on EBSCOhost EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.