The idea of Hegel's Science of logic / Stanley Rosen.

By:

Rosen, Stanley, 1929-2014 [author.]

Material type: Text

text

Media type:

computer

Carrier type:

online resource

ISBN:

9780226065915
022606591X

Subject(s):

Genre/Form:

Electronic books.

Additional physical formats: Print version: No titleDDC classification:

160 23

LOC classification:

B2949.L8 R668 2014

Online resources:

Click here to access online

Contents:

Acknowledgments; Introduction; One. The Historical Context; Two. The Prefaces; Three. The Introduction; Four. The Beginning of Logical Science; Five. From Being to Existence; Six. Transitional Remarks; Seven. Quantity; Eight. Quantitative Relation; Nine. Transition to Book Two; Ten. The Fichtean Background; Eleven. The Nature of Essence; Twelve. Contradiction; Thirteen. Absolute Ground; Fourteen. Foundationalism and Antifoundationalism; Fifteen. Appearance; Sixteen. Actuality; Seventeen. Introduction to Book Three; Eighteen. Subjectivity; Nineteen. Judgment; Twenty. Objectivity.

Twenty-One. The IdeaNotes; Index.

Summary: Although Hegel considered 'Science of Logic' essential to his philosophy, it has received scant commentary compared with the other three books he published in his lifetime. Here philosopher Stanley Rosen rescues the 'Science of Logic' from obscurity, arguing that its neglect is responsible for contemporary philosophy's fracture into many different and opposed schools of thought.

Item type:

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings
Item type	Home library	Collection	Call number	Materials specified	Status	Date due	Barcode
Electronic-Books	OPJGU Sonepat- Campus	E-Books EBSCO			Available

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Although Hegel considered 'Science of Logic' essential to his philosophy, it has received scant commentary compared with the other three books he published in his lifetime. Here philosopher Stanley Rosen rescues the 'Science of Logic' from obscurity, arguing that its neglect is responsible for contemporary philosophy's fracture into many different and opposed schools of thought.