Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Brothers in arms : Chinese aid to the Khmer Rouge, 1975-1979 / Andrew Mertha.

By: Material type: TextTextPublisher: Ithaca, New York : Cornell University Press, 2014Copyright date: ©2014Description: 1 online resourceContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9780801470738
  • 0801470730
  • 1501731238
  • 9781501731235
Subject(s): Genre/Form: Additional physical formats: Print version:: Brothers in armsDDC classification:
  • 338.91/51059609047 23
LOC classification:
  • DS554.58.C65 M47 2014eb
Online resources:
Contents:
Assessing China's relations with Democratic Kampuchea -- Parochial totalitarianism : the Khmer Rouge bureaucracy -- The bureaucratic structure of Chinese overseas assistance -- DK pushback and military institutional integrity -- The failure of the Kampong Som petroleum refinery project -- China's development of Democratic Kampuchean trade -- What is past is present.
Summary: When the Khmer Rouge came to power in Cambodia in 1975, they inherited a war-ravaged and internationally isolated country. Pol Pot's government espoused the rhetoric of self-reliance, but Democratic Kampuchea was utterly dependent on Chinese foreign aid and technical assistance to survive. Yet in a markedly asymmetrical relationship between a modernizing, nuclear power and a virtually premodern state, China was largely unable to use its power to influence Cambodian politics or policy. In Brothers in Arms, Andrew Mertha traces this surprising lack of influence to variations between the Chinese and Cambodian institutions that administered military aid, technology transfer, and international trade. Today, China's extensive engagement with the developing world suggests an inexorably rising China in the process of securing a degree of economic and political dominance that was unthinkable even a decade ago. Yet, China's experience with its first-ever client state suggests that the effectiveness of Chinese foreign aid, and influence that comes with it, is only as good as the institutions that manage the relationship. By focusing on the links between China and Democratic Kampuchea, Mertha peers into the "black box" of Chinese foreign aid to illustrate how domestic institutional fragmentation limits Beijing's ability to influence the countries that accept its assistance
Item type:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Home library Collection Call number Materials specified Status Date due Barcode
Electronic-Books Electronic-Books OPJGU Sonepat- Campus E-Books EBSCO Available

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Assessing China's relations with Democratic Kampuchea -- Parochial totalitarianism : the Khmer Rouge bureaucracy -- The bureaucratic structure of Chinese overseas assistance -- DK pushback and military institutional integrity -- The failure of the Kampong Som petroleum refinery project -- China's development of Democratic Kampuchean trade -- What is past is present.

Print version record.

When the Khmer Rouge came to power in Cambodia in 1975, they inherited a war-ravaged and internationally isolated country. Pol Pot's government espoused the rhetoric of self-reliance, but Democratic Kampuchea was utterly dependent on Chinese foreign aid and technical assistance to survive. Yet in a markedly asymmetrical relationship between a modernizing, nuclear power and a virtually premodern state, China was largely unable to use its power to influence Cambodian politics or policy. In Brothers in Arms, Andrew Mertha traces this surprising lack of influence to variations between the Chinese and Cambodian institutions that administered military aid, technology transfer, and international trade. Today, China's extensive engagement with the developing world suggests an inexorably rising China in the process of securing a degree of economic and political dominance that was unthinkable even a decade ago. Yet, China's experience with its first-ever client state suggests that the effectiveness of Chinese foreign aid, and influence that comes with it, is only as good as the institutions that manage the relationship. By focusing on the links between China and Democratic Kampuchea, Mertha peers into the "black box" of Chinese foreign aid to illustrate how domestic institutional fragmentation limits Beijing's ability to influence the countries that accept its assistance

In English.

eBooks on EBSCOhost EBSCO eBook Subscription Academic Collection - Worldwide

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonepat-Narela Road, Sonepat, Haryana (India) - 131001

Send your feedback to glus@jgu.edu.in

Hosted, Implemented & Customized by: BestBookBuddies   |   Maintained by: Global Library