Jurisprudential Regimes : the Supreme Court, Civil Rights, and the Life Cycle of Judicial Doctrine.

By:

Marlowe, Marcella

Material type: Text

TextSeries: Recht und GesellschaftPublication details: El Paso : LFB Scholarly Pub. LLC, 2010.Description: 1 online resource (182 pages)Content type:

text

Media type:

computer

Carrier type:

online resource

ISBN:

9781593326623
1593326629

Subject(s):

Genre/Form:

Additional physical formats: Print version:: Jurisprudential Regimes : The Supreme Court, Civil Rights, and the Life Cycle of Judicial Doctrine.DDC classification:

347.73/26 347.7326

LOC classification:

KF8742 .M275 2011

Online resources:

Click here to access online

Contents:

Acknowledgements; CHAPTER 1: Introduction to Jurisprudential Regimes; CHAPTER 2: Regimes & Phases -- Telling a Story; CHAPTER 3: The Jim Crow Era; CHAPTER 4: The Civil Rights Era; CHAPTER 5: The Affirmative Action Era; CHAPTER 6: Bringing It All Together; Bibliography; Index.

Summary: Marlowe?s work draws on institutional-based Supreme Court literature, American Political Development literature, and emerging jurisprudential regime literature to argue that Court doctrine in caselaw follows a life cycle pattern consisting of a pre-governance phase, where the Court has not settled on a doctrinal test to apply consistently, a governance phase, where the Court establishes and consistently applies one doctrinal test in a given area of caselaw, and a post-governance phase, where consensus regarding the existing doctrinal test breaks down. She examines the life cycle pattern and it.

Item type:

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings
Item type	Home library	Collection	Call number	Materials specified	Status	Date due	Barcode
Electronic-Books	OPJGU Sonepat- Campus	E-Books EBSCO			Available

Marlowe?s work draws on institutional-based Supreme Court literature, American Political Development literature, and emerging jurisprudential regime literature to argue that Court doctrine in caselaw follows a life cycle pattern consisting of a pre-governance phase, where the Court has not settled on a doctrinal test to apply consistently, a governance phase, where the Court establishes and consistently applies one doctrinal test in a given area of caselaw, and a post-governance phase, where consensus regarding the existing doctrinal test breaks down. She examines the life cycle pattern and it.